Alexander Pushkin himself knew firsthand numerous examples of courage and cowardice, because he lived in an era when it was almost impossible to hide manifestations of character. Duels, military service, hunting, cards - all the entertainments of the nobility required a demonstration of courage and the protection of honor. Perhaps that is why the writer invested his efforts in creating a historical mirror of a bygone era, where the moral virtues and imperfections of a person were even more obvious. On the pages of the work, he tried to give a lesson to his generation and those who will replace him, to teach people the true virtue of the soul. In particular, in The Captain's Daughter one can find convincing arguments on the topic "Courage and cowardice" that will help graduates in writing the final essay in this direction.
An example of a brave person is the protagonist of Pushkin's story "The Captain's Daughter". He shows his courage in the defense of the fortress when the rebels attack it. Peter was eager to fight and did not disgrace the nobleman's honor. But much more shocking is his refusal to take the oath to Pugachev, who promises martyrdom. However, Grinev is not timid, and he does not think of himself as a traitor. Even the enemy respects this trait in him. Therefore, the next heroic deed falls to his lot after liberation from the fortress. The young man rescues Masha, and at the same time disobeys the command. As a result, they want to condemn him for formal “treason.” But even in this situation, Grinev does not justify himself and does not regret his act, because courage in a person often coexists with conscientiousness, honor and dignity.
Phenomenal cowardice is portrayed by Pushkin in the story "The Captain's Daughter". Shvabrin becomes a traitor to the marrow of his bones through the fault of his all-consuming fear. Alexei is ready to do anything to avoid danger. For example, he drops his dignity by using a dishonest trick in a duel with Peter. To avoid competition on his part, he also acts vilely: he denigrates Masha in the eyes of the gentleman. But his lowest act was the oath to the rebel Pugachev, for which he prepared in advance, foreseeing defeat. Thus, cowardice became the cause of the moral decay of the individual.
Shvabrin demonstrates cowardice in love, trying to get Marya's heart with cunning and dishonorable behavior. He is afraid to appear before her as is, without falsehood and endless meanness. The hero is not capable of a frank confession either. He only hurts the girl in every possible way, instead of showing attention and care. His feelings are also saturated with fear, like himself, and the heroine feels this, therefore she prefers another person. It is not surprising, because people quite rightly do not like the timidity and uncertainty of a person in actions, words and feelings. Therefore, the lack of courage can hurt not only on the battlefield, but also in personal life.
Cowardice is to some extent manifested in the behavior of Grinev's father, who refuses to give his son a blessing. His fear can be understood: the son could be deceived out of selfish motives. Still, the state of Mary was incomparable with the wealth of Peter. The girl hardly had any reason to claim such an unequal marriage. The hero was afraid that she was just a selfish and hypocritical person who wants to get out "from rags to riches." But he was afraid for the fate of the heir - this feeling can be understood and justified, therefore it cannot be said that this or that cowardly act is always dictated by the meanness of a person. Sometimes such behavior is quite forgivable, because we are talking about the people dearest to our hearts.
Can be excellent
Raise a person in you.
V. G. Belinsky
In any literary work, one way or another, in one form or another, eternal questions are posed - what is considered the norm of morality? Where is the line separating morality from immorality? Are they different at all? And in almost any work, as a rule, it is about the ideals of morality.
I believe that honor occupies the first place in the series of moral symbols. You can survive the collapse of the economy, endure even parting with the dearest people and with the Motherland, but not a single people on earth will ever put up with the decay of morality. In human society, dishonorable people have always been treated with contempt.
The loss of honor is a fall in moral foundations, followed by an inevitable punishment: entire states disappear from the map of the earth, peoples disappear into the black hole of history, individuals die.
Russian writers have always addressed the issue of honor in their works. Today, in our difficult time, it sounds especially acute.
The concept of honor is brought up in a person from childhood. On the example of A. S. Pushkin's story "The Captain's Daughter" one can clearly see how this happens in life and what results it leads to. The protagonist of the story, Pyotr Andreevich Grinev, was brought up in an atmosphere of high morality from childhood. On the first pages of the story, Pushkin, through the lips of Savelich, acquaints readers with the moral attitudes of the Grinev family: “It seems that neither father nor grandfather were drunkards; there’s nothing to say about mother ... ”The old servant of his ward Pyotr Grinev brings up with these words, who for the first time got drunk and behaved unsightly. And before leaving for the service, Grinev receives a covenant from his father: “Take care of the dress again, and honor from a young age.” This folk proverb is also an epigraph to the work. The whole subsequent history of Grinev is the fulfillment, despite all the difficulties and mistakes, of this paternal testament. But honor is a broadly understood term. If for Grinev the father, honor is first of all the honor of a nobleman and officer, then Grinev the son, without abandoning such an understanding, was able to expand the concept of honor to its human and civil meaning.
In him, as it were, the kind, loving heart of his mother was combined with honesty, directness, courage - qualities that are inherent in his father.
The first time Grinev acted honorably, returning the card debt, although in that situation Savelich tried to persuade him to evade the calculation. But nobility prevailed.
A man of honor, in my opinion, is always kind and disinterested in dealing with others. These qualities were manifested in a generous gift to a "peasant" unknown to him, who showed the way during a snowstorm and which then played a decisive role in his entire future fate. And how, risking everything, he rushed to the rescue of the captured Savelich.
Trials awaited Grinev in the fortress where he served. By his behavior here, Pyotr Andreevich proved his loyalty to his father's precepts, did not change what he considered his duty and his honor. Shvabrin interferes with Grinev's love for Masha Mironova, weaves intrigues. In the end, it comes down to a duel. The complete opposite of the honest and direct Grinev is his rival Alexei Ivanovich Shvabrin. He is a selfish and ungrateful person. For the sake of his personal goals, Shvabrin is ready to commit any dishonorable act. He slanders Masha Mironova, casts a shadow on her mother. He inflicts a treacherous blow to Grinev in a duel and, in addition, writes a false denunciation of him to Grinev the father. Shvabrin goes over to Pugachev’s side not out of ideological convictions: he expects to save his life, hopes to make a career with him if Pugachev succeeds, and most importantly, he wants, having dealt with his rival, to forcefully marry a girl who does not love him.
Honesty and decency occupies a special place in the characteristics of the characters. It is amazing how honest Masha and Grinev are with each other. Between them it is natural to understand, save, pity each other. Mutual devotion helps them overcome life's difficulties and find happiness.
During the rebellion, the moral qualities of some heroes and the meanness of others were especially clearly manifested. For example, Captain Mironov and his wife preferred to die rather than surrender to the mercy of the rebels. Grinev did the same, not wanting to swear allegiance to Pugachev, but was pardoned. It seems to me that the author made it clear to the reader that Pugachev showed generosity towards the young officer not only out of a sense of gratitude for the old service. He equally, it seemed to me, appreciated the man of honor in Grinev. The leader of the uprising himself was not alien to the concepts of honor. In addition, thanks to him, Grinev and Masha found each other forever.
Here, too, Shvabrin turned out to be powerless in the implementation of his selfish plans, since Pugachev not only did not support him, but also clearly made it clear that he was dishonest and therefore Grinev was not a competitor.
The ending of the story is also interesting: Grinev is arrested on a denunciation for his connection with the rebellious ataman. He faces the death penalty, but Grinev decides for reasons of honor not to name his beloved. If he had told the whole truth about Masha, then he would certainly have been acquitted. And at the very last moment, justice has triumphed: Masha appeals to the lady, who turns out to be the empress, to pardon Grinev. And the fate of her beloved Masha was decided for the better.
Grinev remained a man of honor to the end. He was present at the execution of Pugachev, to whom he owed his happiness. Pugachev recognized him and nodded his head from the scaffold.
Unfortunately, now there are very few people like Petr Grinev, honest, kind and disinterested. Modern society has almost lost these qualities. And so I want the proverb “take care of honor from a young age” for everyone to have the meaning of a life talisman that helps to overcome the harsh life obstacles.
Shvabrin Alexey Ivanovich is one of the negative characters of this work. In the novel, he is the image of a young officer from a fairly wealthy family of a noble family. As an officer, he was demoted to the Belgorod fortress, due to the murder of his comrade.
Shvabrin Aleksey Ivanovich did not differ in sufficiently beautiful features, however, notes of liveliness were traced in him. He also did not differ in height and, moreover, suffered from excessive thinness.
From personal qualities, Shvabrin had a fairly good mind, quick wit and wit. His dialogues are filled with poignant and engaging themes that keep the reader even more drawn in. But since he was a negative character, Shvabrin was endowed with such qualities as slander and fiction. So, for example, he described Maria Mironova as an absolute fool, but in fact she was a very smart and good-natured girl.
In many scenes, he retained his importance and very pompous appearance. He constantly made inappropriate and rude jokes that were alien to his environment. Shvabrin always loved to laugh at someone and got great pleasure from it. This man had nothing sacred. He completely refused to believe in God, and therefore it was all the same to him that he was ranked among the murderers.
A deceitful, impudent, besides, a vile person who betrayed his army and then calmly transferred to the detachments of the impostor Pugachev. After that, Shvabrin received in the Pugachev detachment, the post of head of the Belgorod fortress. And taking advantage of his position, he kidnaps Masha and holds her by force, thus trying to win favor from her. But as a result, there is justice in everything and Shvabrin is arrested for committing treason.
Composition The image and characteristics of Shvabrin
Alexey Ivanovich Shvabrin is a minor and negative hero of the story "The Captain's Daughter". This is a young, educated officer from a wealthy family. He was not tall, his face was swarthy and ugly. He knew French and skillfully wielded a sword.
He once served in the Guards. There he stabbed a lieutenant with a sword and was sent to serve in the remote Belogorsk fortress.
In the fortress, Shvabrin meets Pyotr Grinev, who has arrived for military service. At first, he seems to be a very friendly and witty person who is interesting and fun to spend time with.
But, in the future, the hero is revealed from the other side. He was in love with the daughter of Captain Mironov, but she did not reciprocate. Being a vindictive, cowardly and vile person, he began to spread bad rumors about her and her family.
He quarrels with Pyotr Grinev because of jealousy for Masha Mironova and wants to fight him in a duel. During the duel, he strikes in the back, for a moment the opponent turned away. He writes a false letter to Grinev's father, after which Peter's mother falls ill.
Aleksey Shvabrin is a dishonest and unscrupulous person. During the attack of Pugachev's gang on the fortress, he betrays his own and immediately goes over to the side of the villains. Then the impostor Pugachev appoints him commandant of the fortress. His appearance changes, he becomes important, dresses in Cossacks and grows a beard.
He takes advantage of his new position and forcibly holds the captain's daughter Masha. He mistreats her, keeps her locked up, humiliates her in every possible way and starves her. But all his attempts to force Masha Mironova to become his wife are in vain.
At the end of the story, Alexei Shvabrin is arrested. He looks thin and exhausted, his face becomes pale, and his once black hair turns gray. From the impotence and anger that overwhelms him, he tries to annoy his rival Pyotr Grinev. Shvabrin gives false testimony about him. He assures that Grinev joined the ranks of Pugachev and is a traitor to the motherland. He manifests himself as a vile, hypocritical and deceitful person.
Shvabrin's character does not cause any respect and compassion.
Option 3
Shvabrin Alexey Ivanovich is a minor hero, an aristocrat, a nobleman who, for one reason or another, ended up in the Belgorod fortress. He is a young officer of average height. He is well educated and can speak. There is always a joke and wit in his speech. Once upon a time, he was in love with Masha Mironova, the only daughter of the head of the fortress, but was refused, which he was not particularly pleased with. He has been serving in the Belgorod fortress for the fifth year.
After the refusal of Masha Mironova, Shvabrin begins to spread dirty rumors about her in the fortress and beyond. Given this circumstance, we can say with confidence that this is not a very honest person.
His cunning, deceit is proved by the fact that he took advantage of the fact that during the duel Grinev was distracted by Savelich, namely Alexei Ivanovich shot him. Further, Shvabrin writes a letter about the duel to Grinev's father, knowing that this could aggravate the position of Grinev Jr.
At the moment of the capture of the Belgorod fortress, seeing that Pugachev and his associates are winning. Shvabrin, without thinking about anything, goes over to the side of the barbarian and the robber. In the service of Pugachev, Grinev continues to lie and commit all sorts of tricks and meanness. Upon learning that Masha Mironova was alone in the fortress and no one could protect her, he decided to use his power. He rudely harasses the daughter of the murdered fortress commandant, which does not speak of his love for Masha Mironova.
When Shvabrin saw that Grinev was under the protection of Pugachev, he fell down before the feet of the sovereign, forgetting about his dignity and honor. He does not honor anyone or anything. He fears only for his skin, which is worth nothing. But do not forget that Shvabrin is a nobleman, and it is disgusting to see a nobleman lying on the ground.
When Grinev took Maria Ivanovna with him, Shvabrin felt anger and a desire to take revenge on him. He wanted to take revenge not from love for Maria Mironova, but from rivalry and personal vileness and flattery. In the end, Aleksey Ivanovich Shvabrin is arrested for treason.
When Shvabrin is arrested, he will slander Grinev, although he will know that he did not swear allegiance to Pugachev and did not participate in his robbery deeds.
Making a characterization of the image of Shvabrin, it should be noted that Pushkin introduced this negative hero into the novel not only in order to diversify the plot, but also to remind the reader that, in life, there are real bastards who can ruin the life of the people around them.
Shvabrin in Pushkin's story
In the work of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter", the main villain and anti-hero is not the robber Pugachev with his henchmen, but a young Russian officer - Alexei Ivanovich Shvabrin. This is a young man with an absurd disposition, originally from an aristocratic family, with an inflated opinion of himself and his own actions. This character does not have the concept of honor and duty, because after the capture of the Belgorod fortress, without hesitation, he took the side of the enemy, without even remembering that he had taken the most important oath - to defend his homeland.
True love is not known to Alexei Ivanovich. The daughter of the commandant of the fortress, Masha, really liked him, so in a fit of his feelings, Shvabrin proposed marriage to her. The girl refused the young officer, as she felt bad intentions and deceit from him. After the refusal, Alexei did not reconcile himself and decided that he would take revenge on Mary, calling her names and spreading inappropriate rumors about the life of a poor girl. But Masha steadfastly endured Shvabrin's attacks, while Shvabrin himself grew angrier. When capturing the fortress, Alexei Ivanovich managed to get closer to Mary, he put her under lock and key, did not give normal food, but only bread and water, hoping thereby to knock out consent to marriage from the exhausted Masha. This act shows that Alexey does not have mercy and sympathy, he does not feel sorry for the girl, he only thinks about his own benefit and enrichment.
Shvabrin also did not seek to create true and sincere friendship. His meanness and cowardice hurts people. In a duel with Pyotr Grinev, Alexei Shvabrin behaved low and dishonestly, he pierced Pavel in the back when he was distracted. Thus, by his cowardly and dishonorable act, Shvabrin defeated Peter. Alexei also often slandered Grinev, exposing his comrade in a not the best light.
Even when a righteous trial took place over the robbers of Pugachev, Shvabrin did not admit his guilt, but only looked for an excuse to evade justice and shift his guilt onto others.
The image of the dishonest, envious and cowardly Shvabrin is very carefully conveyed by the author, so A. S. Pushkin wanted to show what an officer of the Russian army should not be, and what lies, envy, meanness and cowardice can lead to.
Some interesting essays
- Analysis of the ballad Cup of Zhukovsky Grade 5
The genre orientation of the work is a free translation of Schiller's creation with the poet's emphasis on a specific object in the form of a goblet, which is depicted in the ballad as the desired reward.
We are surrounded by so many people. Some we know, some we know a little, and most are strangers to us. At first glance, all these people are so calm and balanced. You might think that they do not have any thoughts and problems.
Materials for the essay on the novel "The Captain's Daughter"
Are bold actions always reckless? (based on the novel by A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter")
Do you agree that any bold act is reckless? (Based on the novel The Captain's Daughter)
Questionnaire
What is courage and what is recklessness? Can courage be reasonable?
Is it only in wartime that a person is capable of doing bold deeds? Give an example from The Captain's Daughter.
Duel Grinev and Shvabrin
3) Can Grinev's decision to marry Masha Mironova be called a bold but reckless act? What is courage and recklessness?
4) Do you agree that in wartime, times of riots and turmoil, the manifestation of courageous deeds of people manifest themselves more often? What does it have to do with it?)
The situation is such that all the time a person is at risk
5) Can it be argued that such a hero as Savelyich does bold, but reckless acts? What is guided by?
6) And what is the recklessness of Pugachev's behavior? Remember the fairy tale that Pugachev told Grinev and the words that are a guide to action for Pugachev?
7) What are the bold, but reckless actions of Grinev? Does he always act on impulse, or does he sometimes act deliberately? Give examples.
8) What act of P.A. Grineva is unambiguously reckless? Why, condemning recklessness in people, we are not able (have no moral right) to condemn this particular act of Grinev?
Justifies the motive (the reason he does it)
Conclusions
1) It is impossible to unambiguously call any bold act reckless. It is always important to take into account the motives (principles, situations) that guided (took into account) the heroes of the novel "The Captain's Daughter"
2) Not every brave act can be evaluated unambiguously. There are situations when a bold but imprudent act cannot be properly understood and therefore justified.
Material for an essay on the novel"CAPTAIN'S DAUGHTER"
What actions of the heroes of The Captain's Daughter can be called bold, but reckless?
BOLD, BUT RESALE ACTS OF THE HEROES OF THE "CAPTAIN'S DAUGHTER"
BEFORE THE "GOOD SHAKES"
Bold but reckless actions of Pyotr Grinev; prudent actions of Masha Mironova
The desire of Pyotr Grinev to marry Masha Mironova against his father's will can be attributed to the bold step of this hero, but rather reckless. Knowing the cool temper of Grinev Sr., one can imagine how this frivolous decision of Petrusha would have turned out. Fortunately, Masha turned out to be a prudent enough girl and did not want to enter a new family at any cost.
Masha, surprising for a seventeen-year-old girl, shows prudence by refusing an offer to marry Grinev. Of course, accepting a proposal from a loved one against the wishes of his parents would be quite a bold decision. But Masha just has enough of this very prudence to refuse to enter the Grinev family at any cost. This act of the heroine causes admiration in us. (or: Such an act of this heroine cannot but admire)
A bold but reckless act is committed by Grinev, challenging the experienced duelist Shvabrin to a duel. But recklessness is a completely different kind. She is ennobled by the desire of young Grinev to defend the honor of a girl who has been insulted more than once by his rival. He also takes risks because he trusts Shvabrin, hoping for a fair fight. Grinev cannot even imagine that Shvabrin, a man of noble origin, can literally stab him in the back.
IN THE YEAR OF "GOOD SHOCKS"
Pugachev
To raise the people to rebellion, you need to be a decisive and courageous person. And Pugachev is not without such qualities. The courage of Pugachev is the courage of an adventurer who lives by the principle: “It is better to drink blood once than to eat carrion for three hundred years.” Calling himself Emperor Peter the Third, he acts according to the Russian proverb "There is luck for the daring." Of course, one can endlessly admire the courage of Pugachev, who dared to go alone into a snowstorm. But one cannot justify the bloody atrocities of a man who drowned the state in blood. Both the right and the guilty fall under the ax of this adventurer. It is worth remembering Captain Mironov, a faithful soldier who honestly served all century, Ivan Ignatich, the innocent wife of Captain Mironov, the dead family of a young commandant from a neighboring fortress. Seeing all the charismatic features of Pugachev, yet his courage can be fully called reckless.
Captain Mironov
The scene of the execution of Captain Mironov and Ivan Ignatich is that episode of the novel The Captain's Daughter that evokes a wave of sincere admiration from readers for the courage and steadfastness of Russian officers. The brave defenders of the Belogorsk fortress throw such bold words in the face of the impostor that they deprive them of the slightest chance of saving their own lives. But if this chance was, they would not go against the voice of their own conscience. The desperate courage of the defenders of the Belogorsk fortress cannot be called reckless. Each bold word spoken by the words of Ivan Kuzmich and Ivan Ignatievich is pronounced consciously, with a full sense of the rightness of one's own choice.
Pyotr Andreevich Grinev
Grinev more than once finds himself in situations of difficult choice, when you have to choose between feeling and duty. And in order to act reasonably, he had to weigh every word in some situations.
None of the readers is left indifferent by the scene, which can be called a psychological duel between Pugachev and Grinev. Let's look at it in a few details. The newly-appeared Emperor Peter the Third offers Grinev to go over to his side. He could not throw in the face of Pugachev those words that he was ready to say on the day of the execution of Captain Mironov. And now they seemed to him "meaningless boasting." He now diplomatically weighs every word he says to Pugachev. He is afraid to provoke the wrath of the impostor. Is this cowardice? No. By categorically refusing Pugachev to join his army, Pyotr Andreevich nevertheless does not offend Pugachev's vanity. On the contrary, Grinev's bold but honest answers excite a noble gesture in this bloodthirsty tyrant: he lets him go on all four sides. Such a worthy and reasonable behavior of Pyotr Andreevich Grinev is explained by the fact that he feels personally responsible for the fate of Masha and his elderly parents, of whom he is the only son.
One day Grinev will commit an act that cannot be taken unambiguously. This is his unauthorized departure from the besieged Orenburg fortress. This is an act bordering on insanity (with recklessness). Using all available means to convince the military council of the need to storm the Belogorsk fortress and stumbling upon the cold rationality of the commandant, Grinev decides to leave the fortress without permission. Who could he be in the eyes of the military council? Could Grinev's noble act have been correctly understood by his comrades? Definitely not! No noble aspirations to save the hero's daughter could justify this officer. In the eyes of the authorities, he turned out to be a traitor. And if it weren't for the desperate courage of Masha Mironova, who rushed to save her beloved, if it weren't for Masha's fatal meeting with the Empress, the good name of the Russian officer is forever lost. This episode tells us that not every bold, noble in its thoughts, but imprudent act deserves an unequivocal assessment.
SAVELICH
The kind, devoted Savelyevich also often performs bold deeds. It is worth remembering at least what desperate attempts he shows, saving the life of the "master's child". At any second, this reckless action from the point of view of common sense could turn into the wrath of Pugachev, and this old man would share the fate of Captain Mironov. Savelich's courage is noble, as this old man shows it completely disinterestedly. This, of course, causes sincere admiration.
Composition Pushkin A.S. - Captain's daughter
Theme: - The baseness and double-mindedness of Alexei Shvabrin (According to the story by A. S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter")
Alexey Shvabrin is one of the heroes of the story "The Captain's Daughter". This young officer was exiled to the Belogorsk fortress for a duel in which Shvabrin's opponent was killed. When Shvabrin meets Grinev, it is noteworthy that Alexei treats the inhabitants of the fortress with contempt and arrogance. Shvabrin approaches Grinev in order to "finally see a human face." However, not only arrogance determines the character of this hero.The author characterizes Shvabrin as a cynical empty person, capable of slandering a girl only because she refused him reciprocity. Shvabrin commits a number of vile acts that characterize him as a low person, capable of treason, cowardice, and betrayal. Grinev and Shvabrin arrange a duel over the commandant's daughter, and, taking advantage of Grinev's inattention, Shvabrin wounds him. The list of further actions of Alexei is crowned with the scenes of the assault and capture of the Belogorsk fortress. Realizing that the siege of a poorly fortified fortress could not be sustained, Shvabrin went over to the side of Pugachev. When, however, the false emperor instigates a trial, sitting on the porch of the commandant's house, Shvabrin is already among the foremen of the rebels. In order to save his life, Shvabrin kowtows to Pugachev. In truth, the fate of Alexei is unenviable: he is doomed to forever remain a stranger among his own, his own among strangers. Probably, Shvabrin simply tried to forget about such important concepts for a Russian officer as duty to the fatherland, honor, loyalty to this oath. Here is one example of the behavior of a traitor: “Shvabrin fell to his knees ... feelings of hatred and anger. With disgust, I looked at the nobleman, wallowing at the feet of a runaway Cossack. "By torture and hunger, Shvabrin tried to force Masha to become his wife. This episode is resolved safely thanks to the intervention of Pugachev himself. Alexei Shvabrin remains one of the most vivid images of a traitor in Russian literature.
The theme of betrayal occupied Pushkin very much. No wonder the hero of his other famous historical work - the poem "Poltava" - is the rebellious hetman Ivan Mazepa, who committed treason against Peter the Great. However, Alexey Shvabrin is, first of all, the embodiment of a petty traitor. From the history of the Pugachev region, it is known that officers often went over to the side of the rebels. After the defeat of Pugachev, the trial of such people was ruthless and harsh.
Betrayal has many faces. Common to all varieties of betrayal is the abuse of another person's trust. Aleksey Shvabrin betrayed his homeland, his girlfriend, friend, all the inhabitants of the Belogorsk fortress. This is quite enough to be tormented by pangs of conscience for the rest of your life. Did Aleksey Shvabrin, this low and two-hearted hero, who found himself between the whole and true to himself characters of the story "The Captain's Daughter" experience them?