Interview with Stanley Kubrick about filming the moon landing, 3 days later he was gone.
A dying interview of the famous film director Stanley Kubrick has been published, in which he spoke in detail and in detail about the fact that all the moon landings were fabricated by NASA and how he filmed all the footage of the American lunar expeditions on Earth ...
Interview published 15 years after death. Director T. Patrick Murray interviewed Stanley Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. Previously, he was forced to sign an 88-page non-disclosure agreement (NDA) for the contents of the interview for 15 years from the date of Kubrick's death.
Kubrick's dying interview in recent days has become a real sensation all over the world.
In 1971, Kubrick left the US for the UK and never returned to America. All his subsequent films were filmed only in England. For many years, the director led a reclusive life, fearing murder. According to the British newspaper "Sun", the director "was afraid of being killed by American intelligence agencies, following the example of other participants in the television supply of the US lunar scam."
The director died suddenly, allegedly of a heart attack, at the end of the editing period for Eyes Wide Shut, which starred Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. It was Kidman who in July 2002, in an interview with the American newspaper The National Enquirer, reported that Kubrick had been killed. The director called her 2 hours before the official “sudden death” time and asked her not to come to Hertfordshire, where, as he put it, “we will all be poisoned so quickly that we won’t even have time to sneeze.” According to British journalists, the US National Security Agency first tried to kill Kubrick back in 1979.
The violent nature of Kubrick's death on March 7, 1999 at the English estate near Harpenden (Hertfordshire) later became the cause of his widow's revelations. In the summer of 2003, in an interview on French television, and later, on November 16, 2003, in the program “The Dark Side of the Moon” (CBC Newsworld), the widow of the director, German actress Christiane Kubrick (Christiane Susanne Harlan) made a public confession, the essence of which is as follows:
At a time when the USSR was already in full swing exploring space, US President Richard Nixon, inspired, according to the widow, by her husband's sci-fi epic film, which went down in history as one of the best masterpieces of Hollywood "2001: A Space Odyssey" (1968), urged the director, along with other Hollywood professionals, "to save the national honor and dignity of the United States." What the masters of the "dream factory" led by Kubrick did. The decision to falsify was made personally by the President of the United States.
Similar statements from the participants of the "project" were made before.
In particular, rocket engineer Bill Kaysing, who worked at Rocketdyne, the company that built rocket engines for the Apollo program, is the author of We Never Flew to the Moon. The $30 Billion American Hoax" ("We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle"), published in 1974 and co-written with Randy Reid, also claimed that under the guise of a live coverage of NASA's lunar module landing circulated a fake filmed on Earth. For filming, a military training ground in the Nevada desert was used. In the pictures taken at different times by Soviet reconnaissance satellites, one can clearly see huge hangars, as well as a large area of the "lunar surface" dotted with craters. It was there that all the "lunar expeditions" filmed by Hollywood specialists took place.
There were even daredevils among the astronauts themselves. So, the American astronaut Brian O'Leary (Brian O'Leary), answering a direct question, said that "he cannot give a 100% guarantee that Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin really visited the moon."
P.S. Excerpt from A. Novykh's book "Sensei VI"
Yes, it’s cool for America, - Kostya said enthusiastically. - Who would have thought!
It's a pity for the people who live there, - Victor said sympathetically. - Behind the outward show of "freedom" is such slavery in the shackles of the archon's "democracy"!
Yeah, - Kostya assented, - they said that this is the coolest country in the world, that everything there is of the highest standard - from the standard of living to advanced technologies, even they were the first to visit the Moon ...
No, but really, why were the Americans the first to visit the moon, but not ours? - touched Ruslan. We were the first to fly into space!
If you want, I will tell you a big secret, - Sensei said with a barely perceptible smile, watching the conversations of the guys. - Americans have never been to the moon. And in general, a human foot has not set foot there yet, - and clarified with humor, - in the sense of being a creature, and not a print from his boot.
How is it that they were not on the moon ?! - Kostya and Ruslan were surprised at the same time.
Yes, very simple. People have not been to the Moon, - Sensei repeated again.
What, in reality? - Nikolai Andreevich asked intrigued.
Yes. "Flight to the Moon" is a big hoax, misinformation and a large-scale scam, which, however, brought a considerable income to its organizers.
Zhenya looked at Sensei with curiosity.
Yes? This is getting interesting...
Wait, - Nikolai Andreevich stopped Zhenya and turned to Sensei: - How can this be a scam, if, as far as I know, this is a well-known fact. At the same time, as they say, more than half a million viewers around the globe watched the landing of astronauts on the moon. And this lunar epic lasted practically from 1969 to 1972, when American astronauts flew there almost every six months. And in general, because then the USA and the USSR had a whole race for the championship of the flight to the moon. If the Americans cheated, I think the Soviet Union would not keep silent about it.
It's not as simple as you think. Behind that global PR that you are talking about, there were "Freemasons" of the highest level. From this project they have downloaded almost forty billion dollars from the American people alone, as law-abiding taxpayers. Although in fact there was no manned flight to the Moon, and even with those technologies,” Sensei chuckled. - Even now, at the present level of development of science, this is simply not realistic. So all this was just another successful party of the Archons in big politics.
Hmm, but in more detail, - Volodya expressed his general desire, looking at Sensei.
You can, of course, go into more detail, - Sensei shrugged his shoulders. - Although this information, in my opinion, is not of particular interest. These are just games of big politics...
But how the nerves tickle, even the heels itch, - Zhenya “froze”, causing the guys to laugh.
You need to wash more often! Victor replied with humor.
No, really, Sensei, tell me, - Volodya asked again.
What to tell. Dirty story. So many good people died because of this… This scam was started by the Archons during the years of the so-called “great space race” between the USSR and the USA. The faithful servants of the Archons - "Freemasons" - very prudently played on the ambitions of big politicians... At that time, the USSR was in the lead. - And somehow smiling kindly, as if remembering something good, Sensei said warmly: - Why not lead! After all, astronautics was headed by Sergei Pavlovich Korolev himself. He was a good man, of high decency and morality, and very responsible for his thoughts, actions and decisions.
Korolev? Who is this? Politician? - asked Slavik.
Come on! Andrei chuckled. - It's a scientist!
An outstanding scientist, - emphasized Sensei. - Talented design engineer.
Now I know, - the guy answered with a smile.
Korolev was not only an outstanding practical scientist, - Sensei stated, - but also a talented organizer. Everyone who worked with him on the same team admired his incredible enthusiasm. He simply infected people with his absolute confidence in victory. And as they say now, he “intuitively” developed promising directions. It `s naturally. After all, Korolev was far from being an ordinary person. Few people know that in the early thirties, the then young engineer Sergei Korolev met not only with Tsiolkovsky, but also with rather extraordinary non-public personalities who, in addition to the “theory” of astronautics, revealed to him many very interesting things. It was after those meetings that Korolev "fell ill" with the development of jet interplanetary flights. It was thanks to those meetings that he was able, as they will write later, to “predetermine and predict” the future of aviation and astronautics for many years to come, ahead of his time.
And who did he meet? Ruslan said impatiently.
Sensei just smiled mysteriously and continued the story without answering his question.
So, thanks to the inexhaustible enthusiasm of Korolev, a whole era of astronautics began in the Union. Already in 1957, the USSR launched the first satellite of the Earth. Then there were launches of automatic interplanetary stations, including to the Moon, where soil samples were repeatedly taken. Again, it was the Soviet automatic station Luna-2 that first reached the surface of the moon in 1959. The first ever manned flight into space on the Vostok spacecraft is also a merit of the USSR, and so on and so forth. The Americans also did not lag behind and, as they say, stepped on the heels of the Union in space exploration. If Yuri Gagarin flew on April 12, 1961, then the American Alan Shepard - on May 5, 1961. That is, with a small time difference. However, the American was already the second person to visit space. And now it was about the prestige of the country on the world stage. The Archons took advantage of this situation and exorbitant ambitions of people.
Through the then President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, the priority of the program to conquer the moon was announced. By the way, the technical development of this project was carried out by none other than the German designer of rocket and space technology, the former SS Sturmbannführer, the chief designer of the A-4 (V-2) rocket (used in World War II to shell cities in Great Britain, Belgium) - Wernher von Braun. This man also came from the family of a major German financier and influential politician, Baron Magnus von Braun, who was on the same “team” from the Freemasons as Hjalmar Schacht. And after the war, Wernher von Braun will receive American citizenship and will calmly work for the US military-industrial complex, as in his time for Nazi Germany. Moreover, he will be elevated up the career ladder to senior management positions at NASA (US National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
So, the media will begin to strongly convince the American people that since their astronauts did not have time to be the first to fly into space, they simply have to make sure that it is the American who is the first to step on the surface of the Moon. As a result of all these manipulations and speculations, the US Congress allocated simply astronomical at that time appropriations for this “lunar” program, removing them from the pockets of taxpayers, as if the Americans had no other problems than conquering the moon. And for these tens of billions of dollars, they showed the whole world a cheap series about the "epic of the conquest of the moon by man", calling it the loud name "Apollo Program".
Is it in honor of the ancient Greek Olympian god? - Kostya asked with the air of an "expert".
Nikolai Andreevich spoke, as if adding to the guy's words:
- ...healer, soothsayer, and patron of the arts... As I see it, the Archons are great lovers of ancient Greek poetry.
Still, - Sensei smiled. - Who owns the creation of the Olympian religion of Homer ... Only the name of this program did not appear in honor of the mythical god Apollo, although it was presented to the masses in such a beautiful package. Archons are big lovers of double meanings. In fact, with the appearance of the name of the program, everything was much simpler. It’s just that the Archon who came up with this whole large-scale scam is called “Phoebus” in narrow circles for his brilliant mind (which in Greek “phoibos” translates as “brilliant”). And if we consider the word Phoebus in the context of mythology, then this is just another name for Apollo, as "the all-seeing solar deity."
Well, yes, - Victor laughed along with the team, - as they say, everything ingenious is simple!
They staged such a “space” performance that the famous screenwriters can compete with them! Six expeditions have successfully landed on the moon without a hitch. Twelve people have visited the moon. But the Apollo 13 spacecraft, by no means, could land on the lunar surface due to an accident on board. Flew around the moon, and so returned with nothing to Earth.
So it was all a play? Kostya couldn't believe it at all.
Of course. They simply played on the ambitions of people and stole a lot of money. So not only was the American people stripped like a stick, but the Soviet Union was also embroiled in this senseless race.
So, wait, - Nikolai Andreevich said doubtfully. - And what, didn’t our specialists know that it was a “linden”?
Of course they knew. But in exchange for silence and support for the "lunar version", the Soviet Union received huge benefits on the international market ... And then, how did the "Freemasons" cover their tracks, starting from government reshuffles and ending with the elimination of "unreliable" personalities?! And I won’t be surprised if in the future someone becomes seriously interested in this scam, then it suddenly turns out that the original filming of this performance, in which, I must say, a lot of blunders were made, will disappear without a trace. And, as you know, there are no documents, there is no subject of conversation.
So American astronauts have never landed on the moon? Viktor reiterated.
Naturally not. To get to the moon, you have to overcome belts of huge radiation.
But how do astronauts fly into space, go out into open space and return from there alive?
Well, they are under the protection of the gravitational, magnetic field of the earth and do not go beyond it. That is, they fly in near-Earth outer space within acceptable limits from the surface of the Earth. And then, when increased cosmic radiation penetrates into these layers, they are forced to reduce the flight altitude ... Naturally, in the future, with the development of nanotechnology, it will be quite possible for a person to fly both to the Moon and to other nearby planets.
Stanley Kubrick filmed the Apollo moon landings
Illustrious astronaut Alexey Leonov, who personally prepared to participate in the Soviet lunar exploration program, denied years of rumors that American astronauts were not on the moon, and the footage broadcast on television around the world allegedly mounted in Hollywood.
He spoke about this in an interview with RIA Novosti on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first landing of US astronauts in the history of mankind, celebrated on July 20. Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin to the surface of the earth's satellite.
Correspondent: So were or weren't the Americans on the moon?
“Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about the allegedly fabricated footage in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves. By the way, the first person who began to distribute these rumors, was imprisoned for slander," he said in this regard. Alexey Leonov.
The famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov
Correspondent Q: Where did the rumors come from?
"It all started with the fact that when, at the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the famous American film director Stanley Kubrick, who created according to the book of science fiction Arthur Clark journalists who met with Kubrick's wife asked about her husband's work on the film in Hollywood studios for their brilliant film "The Odyssey of 2001". And she honestly said that on Earth there are only two real lunar modules - one in the museum, where no filming has ever taken place, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is in Hollywood, where to develop the logic of what is happening on the screen and additional shootings were made landing of Americans on the moon," the Soviet cosmonaut said.
Correspondent : Why was studio shooting used?
Alexey Leonov explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see on the movie screen the development of what is happening from beginning to end, elements of additional shooting.
"It was impossible, for example, to film a real discovery Neil Armstrong the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon - there was simply no one to remove it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film Armstrong's descent to the moon along the ladder from the ship. These are the moments, really. filmed Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what is happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossip that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set, "explained Alexei Leonov.
Correspondent : Where does truth begin and editing end?
“Real shooting began when Armstrong, who first set foot on the moon, got a little comfortable, installed a highly directional antenna through which broadcast was carried out to Earth. His partner Buzz Aldrin then he also left the ship to the surface and began to film Armstrong, who, in turn, filmed his movement on the surface of the moon," the astronaut specified.
Is it so?
Let's ask a question : what is the volume of captured pictures at the Kubrick Pavilion?
On the Moon and in Earth Orbit no atmosphere to scatter sunlight. Therefore the shadows completely dark and the sky is black even when the sun is shining. The harsh lighting creates a striking effect.
Sun and Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293..
Photo taken by an astronaut Gregory Harbau. The photo shows his colleague Joseph Tanner during the second spacewalk associated with the maintenance of the Space Telescope. Hubble in February 1997. The photograph also shows the stern of the Space Shuttle Discovery and the Sun hovering over the thin crescent of the Earth's limb. Tanner holds a checklist in his left hand, and Harbau is reflected in the helmet of his suit. NASA
That is how it should be. At the same time, a Hasselblad with a focal length of 60 mm is used on the surface of the "moon" than in the upper image of Apollo 11. This means that the objects in the images will be 25% smaller, in particular the Sun. However, in the pictures of a man’s stay on the moon in 1969-1972, everything is different - optical crown and halo around the sun, the angular dimensions of the "sun" are 10 degrees! it twenty times more than the real size of 0.5 degrees (the apparent size of the Sun in the vicinity of the Earth). Below are a number of pictures.
View of the sun near the LM landing site. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6739
View of the sun 100 meters from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6763
View of the sun 300 meters from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 14. AS14-64-9177
View of the sun 4 km from the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-87-11745
View of the sun near the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-85-11367
View of the sun 300 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 16. AS16-109-17856
View of the sun 100 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 17. AS17-134-20410
View of the sun 50 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo17. AS17-147-22580. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.
Halo and crown around the sun on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 indicate the presence of an atmosphere. Details on halo and optical phenomena. Below are pictures of the halo and crown of light sources on Earth in the presence of an atmosphere.
The sun and the halo around it for terrestrial conditions.
Rays and a crown from the sun for terrestrial conditions
Crowns of the Sun.
Halo and crowns of street lamps
1. Optical phenomena are associated with refraction and diffraction on atmospheric water droplets
The diagram shows how two points on the surface of a drop can scatter light and act as sources of a diverging spherical wave. The light increases where the crests of the waves coincide or are of the same sign. The intensity of light decreases where the waves have different amplitudes. Scattered light from the entire surface of the drop plus the contribution of the reflected and transmitted waves are combined in the diffraction pattern - the corona.
The first figure shows the corona from the diffraction of light by small particles. Each point of the illuminated surface is a source of scattered divergent spherical waves ( Huygens-Fresnel principle). The divergent waves intersect each other, where they add up give areas of increased brightness, and where they subtract - dark areas.
The second figure shows scattering from only two points along the central axis, the direction of the incident light, the crests of the two scattered waves always coincide with the shape of the area with bright light intensity.
The third figure shows the sum of all coronas from each spectrum and each particle.
All Apollo photographs with optical phenomena from the sun completely fit within the framework of refraction and diffraction on atmospheric water droplets.
2. Increasing the angular dimensions of the "Sun"
In the case of vacuum, the angular dimensions of the sun, like any light source, remain the same. In the presence of an atmosphere, the situation is different.
Any light wave is scattered by electrons, atoms and molecules of the atmosphere. Moreover, the intensity of the scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the light wavelength. Because of this, each particle becomes a source of light, especially for blue rays. It's about like a diverging wave from a float, after the main wave has passed through it. As a result, due to the presence of an atmosphere, molecules emit light in all directions, especially brightly near the light source. At very high brightness and exposure, it leads to flare on the film and an increase in the angular dimensions of the light source. An example is shown below.
Electric arc; about 5 mm in size. Due to the scattering of light by air molecules, the size of the light ball is tens of times larger than the size of the plasma channel of the arc.
Finally, with a slight coverage of the light source, due to light scattering in the atmosphere, a halo is preserved. This is what we see in the Apollo pictures. There are no such optical phenomena in real vacuum.
Apollo 14. AS14-66-9305
3. The cause of optical phenomena on the moon is dust
On Earth, we often see a blurry sun, for example through a cloud. This is the scattering of sunlight on aerosols (fog, smoke, dust). Their volume in the earth's atmosphere is no more than 0.1% of the volume of gases that make up atmospheric air. Similarly, it can be assumed for the Moon. This means that in order to observe at least approximately the same optical phenomena (corona, crown, and light scattering), the total mass of particles on the Moon per unit volume must be at least 1 g/m³. This is a huge number of particles and is equivalent to the existence of an aerosol atmosphere on the Moon. Still nothing like this was not found.
DISCUSSION
We have more than 5% of the volume of photographs of man's stay on the Moon in 1969-1972 with the image of halos, solar crowns and light scattering, which indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Considering that 5% of the images are included in the panoramas of the area, it can be firmly stated that 30% of the images from the total volume of photographic materials or more than 70% of the stay of astronauts on the surface of the "Moon" is made in the presence of an atmosphere.
The Apollo 12 Panorama (a12pan1162447) consists of more than two dozen photographs, two of which are of the Sun.
More than 70% of photographic documents are photographs taken by Stanley Kubrick! Statement by illustrious cosmonaut Alexei Leonov in support of the Americans' stay on the Moon and about minor studio additional filming bankrupt.
In addition, all images are interconnected in libraries: 1) expedition exits, 2) image numbers, 3) audio conversations, 4) Apollo videos on the official website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). And this means that the pictures of terrestrial origin, along with audio conversations to them NASA issues for documents man's stay on the moon.
Conclusion: This falsification man's stay on the moon, which has been maintained at the highest official level for more than 40 years.
Glare and optical effects from the "sun" for Apollo 11
The first thing to note is the presence of up to 10 different optical axes (the optical axis is a lens) and the absence of one axis of the light source (in this case, the Sun) in the images. According to the laws of Optics, all highlights on the optical axes for one light source converge at one point. This not in any photo Apollo 11 during their stay on the surface of the moon. At the same time, for images from the Apollo 11 orbit, we see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable.
On the several double vision shadows of the lunar module.
Below pictures
Multiple axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5872HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70mm
Three axis light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5935HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70mm
These patterns are obvious for other shots with optical highlights. Below are the glare from the Sun in the same Apollo 11 Hasselblad camera:
View of Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.
View of the Earth from orbit; Apollo 11, AS11-36-5299.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70mm
We see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable. On the several light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 also indicates double vision lunar module shadows:
Ghost shadows from the lunar module indicate multiple light sources above the surface of the moon. AS11-37-5463, AS11-37-5475, AS11-37-5476 andWithincreasedcontrast, brightness. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Magazine: 37; Description: LUNAR MODULE SHADOW ON SURFACE; Film Width: 70 mm.
Two shadows exactly repeat the contour of the lunar module and details: an antenna for long-distance communication and for radio communications of astronauts, an auxiliary engine system, and more. And this is not one random shot, not three shots, but photo series Magazine 37 - about 20 shots! One could suggest that there are always two shadows on the Moon - one from the Sun, the other from the huge and bright crescent of the Earth! However, look - this is the Earth in the pictures of Apollo 11:
View of the lunar module and Earth for Apollo 11; AS11-40-5923, AS11-40-5924. LUNAR MODULE; EARTH.
Compare with the brightness of the Sun (see pictures above). In general, the Sun is far from being the most powerful star in existence, but it is relatively close to the Earth and therefore shines very brightly - 500,000 times brighter than the full Moon and 5,000 times brighter than the full Earth when viewed from the Moon. Our planet shines several orders of magnitude lower.! In addition, keep in mind that the Earth is at its zenith. And what is the shadow of the Earth?! Under you!
All together - this is the absurdities of NASA and the lack of knowledge
But even after the revelation of the fact that the Apollo 11 images of the Moon landing indicate the presence of several light sources in the sky and this is a falsification, NASA defenders persist in their: "The Americans walked on the Moon." The amazing nature of the debaters!
This note about multiple light sources in the sky on the Moon does not apply to flares for the rest of the sojourn missions: Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17. For the images of these missions, we have one axis of the light source. And here it should be noted that the shooting conditions are the same - the low position of the Sun above the horizon, the optical equipment is the same - the Hasselblad camera, the shooting technique is the same, the picture is the same as for Orlov ... However, the axis of the light source is the only one. Photos of Apollo 11 fall out from the general rule. Probably NASA on the "first" flight to the moon not enough power one spotlight.
You can also note the minor "strangeness" of glare on the optics of Apollo 11, in general, the Apollo mission:
- the presence of equidistant twisted spirals in the flare, as in a long-range searchlight;
– asymmetry of glare elements, which is possible if the light source is not symmetrical;
- glare from the presence of a drop of liquid on the lens (re-reflection on the surface of the drop);
– halo and crown (crown) around the sun for Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17, which is possible only in the presence of an atmosphere;
- other.
The halo and crown around the sun in the Apollo 17 image (AS17-147-22580) is evidence of an atmosphere. in detail abouthaloandopticalphenomena . Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.
Conclusion: before us several light sources illuminate the surface of the "Moon" for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This indicates hoax NASA lunar conditions in the pavilion on the ground.
US moon scam. Yuri Mukhin. Maximumliesandnonsense
More detailed and a variety of information about the events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet, you can get on Internet conferences, constantly held on the website "Keys of Knowledge". All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite all waking up and interested ...
Legendary director Stanley Kubrick 2001: A Space Odyssey", "A Clockwork Orange", "The Shining", "Eyes Wide Shut"), a few days before his death, admitted that The US government and NASA paid him a large amount of money to film the landing of US astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin on the moon.In fact, historical footage was allegedly filmed by him in an ordinary studio on Earth.
In the photo: Stanley Kubrick during the work on the film "2001: A Space Odyssey"
Such a sensational statement was made byAmerican Patrick Murray, posting a video interview purporting to be Stanley Kubrick, made 15 years ago.
As explained on the site, the filmmaker's interview only appeared now, since Murray had to sign an 80-page non-disclosure agreement for 15 years from the date of the death of Kubrick, who, we recall, died on March 17, 1999.
I committed a huge fraud on the American public. With the participation of the United States government and NASA. The moon landing was faked, all the landings were fake and I was the person who filmed it."
confesses in the video a man who looks like Stanley Kubrick.
"What are you saying? Are you serious?" Murray laughs.
"Yes, it's a fake," the American director repeats again.
According to Kubrick, the moon landing was only a fantasy of President Nixon, who really wanted to make it a reality. The US government offered the director a large sum of money for filming a plausible video document, and he allegedly agreed to make a "movie".
However, while there is no official evidence that this interview is really real. Perhaps the footage is just an actor who is very similar to a famous director.
Recall that on July 20, 1969, the whole world saw the footage that has already become historical, in which the astronaut of the Apollo 11 mission, Neil Armstrong, makes " one small step for a man, but a giant leap for all mankind."
It is worth noting that in 1971 Kubrick moved from the US to the UK. In the last years of his life, the director repeatedly stated that the American special services would kill him. In 1999, he died, according to the official version - from a heart attack, but many experts believe that the director was killed.
The wife of director Christian Kubrick after her husband's death also claimed that the moon landing was faked in order to "save the honor and dignity of the United States."
Meanwhile, Alexei Leonov, the first person to perform a spacewalk, in an interview with TV channel Zvezda denied rumors that American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin did not land on the moon.
Specialists, including myself, and our lunar group watched one-to-one online how it happened. And Bormann's flight with a flyby in Moscow, and landing, and "Apollo 13" too, ”-
quotes TV channel Leonov.
In a comment to the site, the pilot-cosmonaut, twice Hero of the Soviet Union, explained that some of the footage about the flight of Armstrong and Aldrin to the moon was indeed filmed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see "the development of what is happening from beginning to end." The actual shooting begins after Armstrong sets up a highly directional antenna for broadcasting to Earth.
Who will film the opening of the hatch from the side when there is no one on the moon? -
Leonov explained why additional footage of the landing was needed.
The video of the landing of American astronauts on the Earth’s satellite has been controversial for more than a decade. Rumors about the rigging of the flight to the Moon spread after the widow of American director Stanley Kubrick told reporters about her husband's participation in the filming of the film about the Apollo 11 mission.
Journalists came to Kubrick's wife, and she said: yes, he worked hard when they created the film "Landing on the Moon." These are her words verbatim. And this (rumors about the falsification of the flight to the moon - ed. note) is already speculation. And how the flag dangled, but there was no wind. And the flag was reinforced and twisted. When they put it in the ground, they took off the cover - the reinforced tape untwisted, and it seemed as if it was dangling in the wind, ”
explained the legendary Soviet cosmonaut.
In 2009, Alexei Leonov already spoke out about the rumors that the Americans were not on the moon in 1969. In an interview with RIA Novosti, Leonov stressed that only “absolutely ignorant people” can believe in such a thing.
Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about shots allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves, ”
noted then Alexei Leonov.
MOSCOW, July 20 - RIA Novosti. Famed cosmonaut Alexei Leonov, who personally prepared for participation in the Soviet lunar exploration program, denied years of rumors that American astronauts were not on the Moon, and the footage broadcast on television around the world was allegedly edited in Hollywood.
He spoke about this in an interview with RIA Novosti on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first landing in the history of mankind of US astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin on the surface of an Earth satellite, celebrated on July 20.
So were or weren't the Americans on the moon?
“Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about the allegedly fabricated footage in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves. By the way, the first person who began to distribute these rumors, was imprisoned for slander," Aleksey Leonov noted in this regard.
Where did the rumors come from?
It all started with the fact that when, at the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the famous American film director Stanley Kubrick, who created his brilliant film Odyssey 2001 based on the book of science fiction writer Arthur Clark, journalists who met with Kubrick's wife asked to talk about her husband's work on the film in Hollywood studios.And she honestly said that there are only two real lunar modules on Earth - one in the museum, where no filming has ever been carried out, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is in Hollywood, where for the development of the logic of what is happening on the screen and additional filming of the landing of the Americans on the moon was made," the Soviet cosmonaut specified.
Why was studio photography used?
Alexei Leonov explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see the development of what is happening on the movie screen from beginning to end, elements of additional filming are used in any movie.
“It was impossible, for example, to film the real opening of the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon by Neil Armstrong - there was simply no one to film it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film Armstrong’s descent to the Moon along the ladder from the ship. Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what is happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossip that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set, "explained Alexei Leonov.
Where Truth Begins and Editing Ends
“Real shooting began when Armstrong, who first set foot on the Moon, got a little used to it, installed a highly directional antenna, through which the broadcast to Earth was carried out. its movement on the surface of the moon," the astronaut specified.
Why did the American flag fly in the airless space of the moon?
“They argue that the American flag was flying on the moon, but it shouldn’t be. The flag really shouldn’t be flying - the fabric was used with a rather rigid reinforced mesh, the cloth was twisted into a tube and tucked into a case. The astronauts took with them a nest, which they first inserted into the lunar soil, and then they stuck the flagpole into it, and only then they removed the cover. And when the cover was removed, the flag cloth began to unfold in conditions of reduced gravity, and the residual deformation of the springy reinforced mesh created the impression that the flag was rippling, as if in the wind " , - Alexey Leonov explained the "phenomenon".
“It’s simply ridiculous and ridiculous to talk about the fact that the entire film was filmed on Earth. The United States had all the necessary systems that tracked the launch of the launch vehicle itself, acceleration, flight orbit correction, flight around the Moon by the descent capsule and its landing,” concluded the famous Soviet cosmonaut.
What did the "lunar race" lead to two space superpowers
“In my opinion, this is the best competition in space that mankind has ever carried out. The “moon race” between the USSR and the USA is the achievement of the highest peaks of science and technology,” Alexei Leonov believes.
According to him, after the flight of Yuri Gagarin, US President Kennedy, speaking in Congress, said that the Americans simply thought too late about what triumph could be achieved by launching a man into space, and therefore the Russians triumphantly became the first. Kennedy's message was clear: within ten years, land a man on the moon and return him safely to Earth.
"It was a very true step of the great politician - he united and rallied the American nation to achieve this goal. Huge funds for those times were also involved - 25 billion dollars, today, this is, perhaps, all fifty billion. The program included a flyby of the moon, then the flight of Tom Stafford to the point of hovering and selection of a site for landing on Apollo 10. Sending Apollo 11 already provided for the direct landing of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon. Michael Collins remained in orbit and waited for the return of his comrades, " - said Alexei Leonov.
18 Apollo-type ships were made to prepare for landing on the moon - the whole program was implemented perfectly, except for Apollo 13 - from the engineering point of view, nothing special happened there, it just failed, or rather, one of the fuel cells exploded , the energy weakened, and therefore it was decided not to land on the surface, but to fly around the Moon and return to Earth.
Alexei Leonov noted that only Frank Bormann's first flight around the moon, then Armstrong and Aldrin's landing on the moon, and the Apollo 13 story remained in the memory of the Americans. These accomplishments have brought the American nation together and made every individual empathize, walk with fingers crossed, and pray for their heroes. The last flight of the Apollo series was also extremely interesting: American astronauts no longer just walked on the Moon, but traveled on its surface in a special lunar vehicle, making interesting photographs.
In fact, it was the peak of the Cold War, and in this situation, after the success of Yuri Gagarin, the Americans simply had to win the "moon race". The USSR then had its own lunar program, and we also implemented it. By 1968, it had already existed for two years, and the crews of our cosmonauts were even formed for a flight to the Moon.
On censorship of the achievements of mankind
"The launches of the Americans as part of the lunar program were broadcast on television, and only two countries in the world - the USSR and communist China - did not broadcast these historical footage to their peoples. I thought then, and now I think - in vain, we simply robbed our people ", flying to the moon is the property and achievement of all mankind. The Americans watched Gagarin's launch, Leonov's spacewalk - why couldn't the Soviet people see it ?!", laments Alexei Leonov.
According to him, a limited group of Soviet space specialists watched these launches through a closed channel.
“We had military unit 32103 on Komsomolsky Prospekt, which provided space broadcasting, since there was no TsUP in Korolev then. The Americans set up a television antenna on the surface of the moon, and everything they did there was transmitted through a television camera to Earth, several repetitions of these television broadcasts were also made.When Armstrong stood on the surface of the moon, and everyone in the USA clapped, we are here in the USSR , Soviet cosmonauts, also crossed their fingers for good luck, and sincerely wished the guys success, "recalls the Soviet cosmonaut.
How was the implementation of the Soviet lunar program
"In 1962, a decree was issued, signed personally by Nikita Khrushchev, on the creation of a spacecraft to fly around the moon and use the Proton launch vehicle with an upper stage for this launch. In 1964, Khrushchev signed a program for the USSR to carry out a flyby , and in 1968 - landing on the moon and returning to Earth. And in 1966 there was already a decision on the formation of lunar crews - a group was immediately recruited for landing on the moon, "Alexey Leonov recalled.
The first stage of the flyby of the Earth satellite was to be carried out with the help of the launch of the L-1 lunar module by the Proton launch vehicle, and the second stage - landing and returning back - on the giant and most powerful N-1 rocket, equipped with thirty engines with a total thrust of 4.5 thousand tons with the weight of the rocket itself about 2 thousand tons. However, even after four test launches, this super-heavy rocket did not fly normally, so it had to be abandoned in the end.
Korolev and Glushko: the antipathy of two geniuses
"There were other options, for example, using a 600-ton engine developed by the brilliant designer Valentin Glushko, but Sergei Korolev refused it, since he worked on highly toxic heptyl. Although, in my opinion, this was not the reason - just two leaders , Korolev and Glushko - could not and did not want to work together. Their relationship had its own problems of a purely personal nature: Sergei Korolev, for example, knew that Valentin Glushko had once written a denunciation against him, as a result of which he was sentenced to ten years When Korolyov was released, he found out about this, but Glushko did not know that he knew about it, "said Alexei Leonov.
A small step for a man, but a giant leap for all mankind
NASA's Apollo 11 spacecraft on July 20, 1969, with a crew of three astronauts: Commander Neil Armstrong, Lunar Module Pilot Edwin Aldrin, and Command Module Pilot Michael Collins, became the first to reach the Moon in the USSR-US space race. The Americans did not pursue research tasks in this expedition, its goal was simple: to land on the Earth's satellite and return successfully.
The ship consisted of a lunar module and a command module that remained in orbit during the mission. Thus, of the three astronauts, only two went to the moon: Armstrong and Aldrin. They had to land on the moon, collect samples of the lunar soil, take pictures on the Earth satellite and install several instruments. However, the main ideological component of the trip was the hoisting of the American flag on the moon and the holding of a video communication session with the Earth.
The launch of the ship was watched by US President Richard Nixon and German rocket scientist Hermann Oberth. A total of about a million people watched the launch at the cosmodrome and mounted observation platforms, and more than a billion people watched the television broadcast, according to the Americans, around the world.
Apollo 11 launched to the moon on July 16, 1969 at 1332 GMT and entered lunar orbit 76 hours later. The command and lunar modules were undocked about 100 hours after launch. Despite the fact that NASA intended to land on the lunar surface in automatic mode, Armstrong, as the expedition commander, decided to land the lunar module in semi-automatic mode.
The lunar module landed on the Sea of Tranquility on July 20 at 20:17:42 GMT. Armstrong descended to the lunar surface on July 21, 1969 at 02:56:20 GMT. Everyone knows the phrase that he uttered when he set foot on the moon: "This is one small step for a person, but a giant leap for all mankind."
Aldrin also landed on the moon 15 minutes later. The astronauts collected the necessary amount of materials, placed the instruments and installed a television camera. After that, they planted an American flag in the field of view of the camera and held a communication session with President Nixon. The astronauts left a commemorative plaque on the Moon with the words: "Here, people from the planet Earth first set foot on the Moon. July 1969 of the new era. We came in peace on behalf of all Humanity."
Aldrin was on the moon for about an hour and a half, Armstrong for two hours and ten minutes. At the 125th hour of the mission and the 22nd hour of stay on the Moon, the lunar module was launched from the surface of the Earth's satellite. The crew splashed down on the blue planet about 195 hours after the start of the mission, soon the astronauts were picked up by the aircraft carrier that came to the rescue.
... 5 minutes before takeoff, when the pre-launch countdown was already underway, the hatch of the launch vehicle suddenly opened, and the stunned astronauts were asked to urgently leave the ship. All three were secretly put on a bus, and then taken by helicopter (and later by plane) from the cosmodrome to a secret air base. However, the historic launch still took place right on schedule. But no crew. The parting speeches of the Vice President of the United States were pompous: "We really need a victory in space, the prestige of America is at stake!"
Frame from the film "Capricorn-1"
Meanwhile, one of the leaders of NASA explains to the shocked astronauts that due to imperfect life support systems, the crew would have been waiting for the fate of suicide bombers. Therefore, the President personally decided to stage a successful mission.
The main flight data and voices of the astronauts are recorded during training, and these recordings are already being broadcast to Earth, ostensibly from the ship. The astronauts are also invited to take part in staged filming of the landing and in subsequent communication sessions. At the base, everything is equipped for imitation: special soil is poured, there are copies of the lander and the return capsule. Few NASA specialists and some special services are devoted to the essence of the operation. The rest (including most NASA employees) have no idea. The scam succeeds completely: the whole world is watching “a small step for a person, and a huge step for humanity” ...
Frame from the film "Capricorn-1"
How do I know all this, you ask? Observed with my own eyes. In the cinema, in the American-British film Capricorn 1 (1978) directed by Peter Hyams. True, there was talk of an American expedition to Mars, but the allusions are more than transparent. Of course, the easiest way to explain the plot is by a dashing notion of a screenwriter or a delusional director. But! In "Capricorn" there are coincidences that "just like that" do not happen. For example, real shots of the launch and flight of the American Saturn-5 lunar rocket are shown. In the ship where the astronauts land at the beginning of the film, and in the staged scenery, it is also easy to guess the Apollo.
When the astronauts landed on the surface, the shooting was slowed down: it seems like they jump off with less gravity. But the film crew obviously overdid it: the slowdown turned out to be too strong, as if they were not on Mars, but on the Moon.
Frame from the film "Capricorn-1"
According to the scenario, the Vice President of the United States mentions that $24 billion was spent on the Capricorn program. And - wow! - this is exactly how much the Apollo program cost in reality (approximately today's $ 145 billion). At the launch of Apollo 11, just like in the film, the president (Nixon) was absent, referring at the last moment to urgent state affairs (at one time this caused a lot of rumors). Capricorn's life support system, according to NASA's cinematic executive, would have worked for three weeks. The life support system of the real Apollo was also designed for three weeks ...
But the most interesting thing is not even in these coincidences, but in how the further fate of invented and real astronauts developed. In the film, the two main characters are killed by insidious intelligence agencies. The life of the first two "lunatics", Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, also, to put it mildly, failed, despite the feat they accomplished (?). Aldrin retired from the US Air Force in 1972, after which he suffered from alcoholism and depression for many years. Now he writes fantasy novels. Armstrong retired from the Air Force even earlier, in 1971. At one time he taught at Ohio State University, then he also started selling computers there. He lives very closed, categorically refuses to meet with journalists.