The events in Ukraine, the terrible tragedy that is taking place in the neighboring country, make us think seriously. What are the mechanisms that push a part of society, relying on some ideological dogmas, to overturn the entire social structure, destroy the economy, sacrifice the lives of thousands of compatriots?
Cookies and learning
It is quite obvious that the notorious cookies that US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland handed out on the Maidan are only a small part of the efforts to ideological, political and informational support for such an “American-style democracy promotion”. The same Mrs. Nuland admitted that over two decades, the United States has invested an astronomical sum in the relevant processes in Ukraine - about 5 billion dollars. And, of course, not all of them agreed to "feed the gullible Bandera from their hands." In the modern arsenal of Western political technologists, there are much more respectable tools.
Today, the necessary ideological and political guidelines are often promoted through networks of supposedly educational, human rights, information, environmental and other similar projects. It is through them that the audience is trying to instill ideas that correspond to American interests about "what is good and what is bad." It turns out, of course, not always. But, as the sad experience of Ukraine shows, quite often it turns out.
In Russia, many organizations designed to "promote American values" operate absolutely openly. The only thing is that they really do not like to talk about the foreign origin of their funds. The campaign unleashed in the West around the introduction of the concept of “foreign agent” into Russian legislation is the best confirmation of this.
The role of the name in history
A typical example is the activities of the organization "Moscow School of Civic Education" (MSCHP). This name became known in Russia not so long ago, and there is a good reason for that. The fact is that this organization was founded in 1992. However, it was originally called differently - the Moscow School of Political Studies (MShPI). And it was financed, in particular, through USAID (US Agency for International Development) and IRI (International Republican Institute - an American non-profit organization, whose director is the odious senator from Arizona, John McCain).
In 2013, the "School" was quietly renamed. There was no clear explanation for this step. But by a strange coincidence, this happened after the Moscow prosecutor's office carried out an inspection for compliance with the law on foreign agents (structures that receive foreign funding and are engaged in political activities in Russia).
Renaming to some extent "covered" this page. The essence, however, has not changed. The list of donors of the Moscow School of Civic Education for 2013 still includes 17 foreign organizations and foundations. Among them, by the way, are the governments of five European countries at once (four of them are NATO members), the MacArthur Foundation, the Polish Cultural Center in Moscow, and other similar structures.
It is worth noting separately that the principle of selecting teachers for the "School" is to give preference to Europeans rather than Russians, and rather to practitioners than theorists. Thus, the majority of MSPP experts are foreigners. The list is quite extensive, at the moment it is 340 people: 154 - Russia, 59 - Great Britain, 26 - France, 25 - USA, 11 each - Poland and Sweden, 10 - Germany, 9 - Spain, 7 - Finland and from one to three experts from other countries, the Council of Europe, the European Parliament.
Finally, the composition of the International Board of Trustees of the MSPP is quite remarkable. It is headed by John Lloyd, editor of the Financial Times. On the British side, its members also include Rodrik Braithwaite (former head of the Joint Intelligence Committee of the British government) and Charles Guthrie (former chief of staff). On the US side, the notorious Ann Applebaum, editor of The Washington Post. Representatives of diplomatic circles, so-called human rights organizations such as Democracy International and others are also present here. The military, intelligence officers, ambassadors, "activists" - a complete set of specialists for organizing "color" revolutions.
Correct Literature
MSPP has its own publishing house. The “MSP Library” series includes such books as: “The Fourth Republic” and “Gifted (!) Democracy” by Vladimir Ryzhkov, “The Lost Decade” by Vladislav Inozemtsev - the main idea of the book is the substantiation of the hypothesis about the “uselessness” of the first decade of the 21st century for Russia and the world, "Youth of Russia", described by the Levada Center team - Lev Gudkov, Natalia Zorka, "Notes of Sisyphus" by the owner of newspapers and steamships Alexander Lebedev and others.
Last year alone, the organization held 27 different events, in which more than 2,000 listeners took part. Moreover, the main emphasis was placed on work in the regions, as well as holding foreign seminars.
The founders of the "School" Elena Nemirovskaya and Yuri Senokosov orient listeners to American values. photo: © Roman BRYGIN
So, on September 7, the 28th session was held as part of the 2014 i-class program, at which political strategist Igor Mintusov spoke about the institution of elections.
From November 9 to 29, 2014, i-class seminars are held with the involvement of the chairman of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Lyudmila Alekseeva, the editor-in-chief of the Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, the president of the INDEM Center for Applied Political Research, Georgy Satarov, and others.
From 2015 online conversations will be held with simultaneous translation into English. Thus, the "School" plans to expand the number of attracted foreign experts.
Who, where and why?
In addition, the "School" regularly holds foreign seminars and meetings of graduates (the pleasure is not cheap, but, apparently, it is more convenient to give some instructions abroad). Thus, in Spain on October 6-8, the following gathered: Toby Gati, former adviser on Russian affairs to US President Bill Clinton, Alexander Gessel, political director of the Council of Europe, two representatives of the Memorial human rights organization, including its executive director Elena Zhemkova, several representatives international state human rights organizations and others.
What are all these people doing in Russia? What do they teach? To whom?
Surprisingly, finding information on this topic is not so easy. Although the scale of the "School" is amazing. Characteristically, the Moscow School of Civic Education, formally declaring its commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy, carries out a significant part of its work in a "closed" mode. According to the news agency Regnum, journalists invited to such events (and media representatives make up a significant proportion of listeners) were required to keep secret about what was happening at the meetings.
However, you can guess which theories are being put forward at the meetings by looking at the content of the articles helpfully posted on the School's website. For example, we are talking about the fact that support for the reunification of Crimea with Russia "is decisively discordant with the principles of order, security and stability." First in one piece, then in another, there are statements about the so-called federalization of Siberia: an idea, although stillborn, but clearly close to the “international trustees of the “School”. And so on.
Given the above, it is reasonable to assume that the listeners of this program are oppositionists and representatives of various kinds of human rights organizations. In practice, however, things are much more complicated.
BY THE WAY
Enlightened Opposition
Indeed, one of the goals of the "Moscow School of Civic Education" is "introducing young civil and political leaders to the modern way of thinking, language and values of democracy." You don't have to look far for examples: among its 2013-2014 graduates are human rights ombudsmen, representatives of organizations like Transparency International, Agora and the Center for Democratic Revival, opposition figures from RPR-PARNAS and Yabloko, and the deceased in the bose of the coordination council of the opposition.
However, among the goals of the MSPP is also “development of the network of graduates of the “School”. In other words, the creation of a branched structure designed to solve some problems.
Indeed, many of her former listeners now occupy prominent positions not in the opposition, but in state bodies. The conclusion suggests itself: the sponsors of the "School" are striving at least to extend their ideological views to people who will have to perform important functions in the state apparatus.
How well this works is a big question. Nevertheless, at different times it was graduated by the former governor of the Volgograd region Sergei Bozhenov, vice-mayor of Novosibirsk Ivan Starikov, vice-mayor of Astrakhan Vladislav Vinogradov, deputy chairman of the government of the Moscow region Mikhail Kuznetsov and deputy chairman of the government of the Moscow region Andrei Ilnitsky, chairman of the faction "Georgian Dream-Republicans", one of the most active organizers of the "Rose Revolution" in Tbilisi David Berdzenishvili and many others.
Finally, a large group of graduates are representatives of the media: both federal and, especially, regional.
In fairness, it should be recognized that there is another point of view. According to her, the "Moscow School of Civic Education" is a serious organization that has not only foreign, but also Russian donors and Russian representatives.
This is true. But the essence nevertheless does not change. For example, when organizing School events in 2012, the ratio of foreign funds to money received from Russian citizens and organizations was almost 12:1. That is, the lion's share of the organization's funding came from abroad. With such a proportion, there is a strong feeling that the contributions of solid Russian participants are required to a greater extent to cover up, to give the appearance of a joint activity of the MSPP.
But the main thing is not even that. Obviously, no matter who is part of this organization from the Russian side, the Moscow School of Civic Education and its members do not influence the domestic policy of the United States. But on the Russian - they are trying. And it makes you think.
"Something and Somehow" from the "School of Civic Education"
The events in Ukraine, the terrible tragedy that is taking place in the neighboring country, make us think seriously. What are the mechanisms that push a part of society, relying on some ideological dogmas, to overturn the entire social structure, destroy the economy, sacrifice the lives of thousands of compatriots?
Cookies and learning
It is quite obvious that the notorious cookies that US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland handed out on the Maidan are only a small fraction of the efforts to ideological, political and informational support for such an "American-style democracy promotion." The same Mrs. Nuland admitted that over two decades the United States has invested an astronomical amount in the relevant processes in Ukraine - about 5 billion dollars. And, of course, not all of them agreed to "feed the gullible Bandera from their hands." In the modern arsenal of Western political technologists, there are much more respectable tools.
Today, the necessary ideological and political guidelines are often promoted through networks of supposedly educational, human rights, information, environmental and other similar projects. It is through them that the audience is trying to instill ideas that correspond to American interests about "what is good and what is bad." It turns out, of course, not always. But, as the sad experience of Ukraine shows, quite often - it turns out.
In Russia, many organizations designed to "promote American values" operate absolutely openly. The only thing is that they really do not like to talk about the foreign origin of their funds. The campaign unleashed in the West around the introduction of the concept of "foreign agent" into Russian legislation is the best confirmation of this.
The role of the name in history
A typical example is the activities of the organization "Moscow School of Civic Education" (MSCHP). This name became known in Russia not so long ago, and there is a good reason for that. The fact is that this organization was founded in 1992. However, it was originally called differently - the Moscow School of Political Studies (MShPI). And it was financed, in particular, through USAID (US Agency for International Development) and IRI (International Republican Institute - an American non-profit organization, whose director is the odious senator from Arizona, John McCain).
In 2013, the "School" was quietly renamed. There was no clear explanation for this step. But by a strange coincidence, this happened after the Moscow prosecutor's office carried out an inspection for compliance with the law on foreign agents (structures that receive foreign funding and are engaged in political activities in Russia).
Renaming to some extent "covered" this page. The essence, however, has not changed. The list of donors of the Moscow School of Civic Education for 2013 still includes 17 foreign organizations and foundations. Among them, by the way, are the governments of five European countries at once (four of them are NATO members), the MacArthur Foundation, the Polish Cultural Center in Moscow and other similar structures.
It is worth noting separately that the principle of selecting teachers for the "School" is to give preference to Europeans rather than Russians, and rather to practitioners than theorists. Thus, the majority of MSPP experts are foreigners. The list is quite extensive, at the moment it is 340 people: 154 - Russia, 59 - Great Britain, 26 - France, 25 - USA, 11 each - Poland and Sweden, 10 - Germany, 9 - Spain, 7 - Finland and from one to three experts from other countries, the Council of Europe, the European Parliament.
Finally, the composition of the International Board of Trustees of the MSPP is quite remarkable. It is headed by John Lloyd, editor of the Financial Times. On the British side, its members also include Rodrik Braithwaite (former head of the Joint Intelligence Committee of the British government) and Charles Guthrie (former chief of staff). On the US side, the notorious Ann Applebaum, editor of The Washington Post. Representatives of diplomatic circles, so-called human rights organizations such as Democracy International and others are also present here. The military, intelligence officers, ambassadors, "activists" - a complete set of specialists for organizing "color" revolutions.
Correct Literature
MSPP has its own publishing house. In the “MSP Library” series, such books are published as: “The Fourth Republic” and “Gifted (!) Democracy” by Vladimir Ryzhkov, “The Lost Decade” by Vladislav Inozemtsev - the main idea of the book is the substantiation of the hypothesis about the “uselessness” of the first decade of the 21st century for Russia and the world, "Youth of Russia", described by the Levada Center team - Lev Gudkov, Natalia Zorka, "Notes of Sisyphus" by the owner of newspapers and steamships Alexander Lebedev and others.
Last year alone, the organization held 27 different events, in which more than 2,000 listeners took part. Moreover, the main emphasis was placed on work in the regions, as well as holding foreign seminars.
So, on September 7, the 28th session was held as part of the 2014 i-class program, at which political strategist Igor Mintusov spoke about the institution of elections.
From November 9 to 29, 2014, i-class seminars are held with the involvement of the chairman of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Lyudmila Alekseeva, the editor-in-chief of the Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, the president of the INDEM Center for Applied Political Research, Georgy Satarov, and others.
From 2015 online conversations will be held with simultaneous translation into English. Thus, the "School" plans to expand the number of attracted foreign experts.
Who, where and why?
In addition, the "School" regularly holds foreign seminars and meetings of graduates (the pleasure is not cheap, but, apparently, it is more convenient to give some instructions abroad). Thus, in Spain on October 6-8, the following gathered: Toby Gati, former adviser on Russian affairs to US President Bill Clinton, Alexander Gessel, director of political affairs of the Council of Europe, two representatives of the Memorial human rights organization, including its executive director Elena Zhemkova, several representatives international state human rights organizations and others.
What are all these people doing in Russia? What do they teach? To whom?
Surprisingly, finding information on this topic is not so easy. Although the scale of the "School" is amazing. Characteristically, the Moscow School of Civic Education, formally declaring its commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy, carries out a significant part of its work in a "closed" mode. According to the news agency Regnum, journalists invited to such events (and media representatives make up a significant proportion of listeners) were required to keep secret about what was happening at the meetings.
However, you can guess which theories are being put forward at the meetings by looking at the content of the articles helpfully posted on the School's website. For example, we are talking about the fact that support for the reunification of Crimea with Russia "is decisively discordant with the principles of order, security and stability." First in one piece, then in another, there are statements about the so-called federalization of Siberia: an idea, although stillborn, but clearly close to the “international trustees of the “School”. And so on.
Given the above, it is reasonable to assume that the listeners of this program are oppositionists and representatives of various kinds of human rights organizations. In practice, however, things are much more complicated.
BY THE WAY
Enlightened Opposition
Indeed, one of the goals of the "Moscow School of Civic Education" is "introducing young civil and political leaders to the modern way of thinking, language and values of democracy." You don't have to look far for examples: among its 2013-2014 graduates are human rights ombudsmen, representatives of organizations like Transparency International, Agora and the Center for Democratic Revival, opposition figures from RPR-PARNAS and Yabloko, and the deceased in the bose of the coordination council of the opposition.
However, among the goals of the MSPP is also “development of the network of graduates of the “School”. In other words, the creation of a branched structure designed to solve some problems.
Indeed, many of her former listeners now occupy prominent positions not in the opposition, but in state bodies. The conclusion suggests itself: the sponsors of the "School" are striving at least to extend their ideological views to people who will have to perform important functions in the state apparatus.
How well this works is the big question. Nevertheless, at different times it was graduated by the former governor of the Volgograd region Sergei Bozhenov, vice-mayor of Novosibirsk Ivan Starikov, vice-mayor of Astrakhan Vladislav Vinogradov, deputy chairman of the government of the Moscow region Mikhail Kuznetsov and deputy chairman of the government of the Moscow region Andrei Ilnitsky, chairman of the faction "Georgian Dream-Republicans", one of the most active organizers of the "Rose Revolution" in Tbilisi David Berdzenishvili and many others.
Finally, a large group of graduates are representatives of the media: both federal and, especially, regional.
In fairness, it should be recognized that there is another point of view. According to her, the "Moscow School of Civic Education" is a serious organization that has not only foreign, but also Russian donors and Russian representatives.
This is true. But the essence nevertheless does not change. For example, when organizing School events in 2012, the ratio of foreign funds to money received from Russian citizens and organizations was almost 12:1. That is, the lion's share of the organization's funding came from abroad. With such a proportion, there is a strong feeling that the contributions of solid Russian participants are required to a greater extent to cover up, to give the appearance of a joint activity of the MSPP.
But the main thing is not even that. Obviously, no matter who is part of this organization from the Russian side, the Moscow School of Civic Education and its members do not influence the domestic policy of the United States. But on the Russian - they are trying. And it makes you think.
We all learned little by little, Something and somehow
Quote from "Eugene Onegin A.S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825).
People who... boast of their learning... actually turn out to be very bad students... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all learned little by little, Something and somehow.
Dictionary of winged words. Plutex. 2004
See what "We all learned a little, Something and somehow" in other dictionaries:
From the novel in verse "Eugene Onegin" (1823 1831) by A. S. Pushkin (1799 1837), ch. 1, stanza 5: We all learned little by little, Something and somehow, So education, thank God, It is not surprising for us to shine. Jokingly ironic: about dilenty, shallow ... Dictionary of winged words and expressions
We all learned little by little, something and somehow- wing. sl. Quote from "Eugene Onegin A. S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825). ... people who ... boast of their learning ... turn out to be very bad students in reality ... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all studied ... ... Universal additional practical explanatory dictionary by I. Mostitsky
We all learned little by little, Something and somehow, So education, thank God, It is not surprising for us to shine. A. S. Pushkin. Evg. Onig. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See Not without sin. See the deserted people and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)
For something and somehow, So education, thank God, It’s not surprising for us to shine. A.S. Pushkin. Evg. Oneg. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See not without sin. Look at the desertedness and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary
somehow- I ka / to something = like nibu / d 1) In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2) unfold Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin) 3) colloquial. When… … Dictionary of many expressions
AS SOMETHING, AS SOMETHING, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2. Expand. Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin). 3. Unfold… … encyclopedic Dictionary
And somehow, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. There is nothing to worry about me. My friends will somehow attach me. Saltykov Shchedrin, Poshekhonskaya antiquity. Arseniy Romanovich was in a hurry to somehow adjust the brace. Fedin, ... ... Small Academic Dictionary
Something, etc. (see what 1), places. indefinite. Some object, phenomenon, etc. from a number of similar ones, or it doesn’t matter what object, phenomenon, etc. We all learned little by little Something and somehow, So we will educate, thank God, With us ... ... Small Academic Dictionary
Aphorisms can be divided into two categories: some catch our eye, are remembered and sometimes used when we want to show off wisdom, while others become an integral part of our speech and go into the category of catchphrases. About authorship ... ...
- (1799 1837) Russian poet, writer. Aphorisms, quotes Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich. Biography It is not difficult to despise the court of people, it is impossible to despise one's own court. Backbiting, even without evidence, leaves eternal traces. Critics... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms
Books
- Winged words, quotes, aphorisms, Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich. The work of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin accompanies us all our lives. Quotes from his works and winged expressions, from the textbook "At the seashore the green oak", crafty" We all studied ...
TOP-50 phrases from school essays.
1. Onegin liked Byron, so he hung him over the bed.
2. Pierre was a man of the world and therefore urinated with perfume.
3. M.Yu. Lermontov died in the Caucasus, but that's not why he loved him!
4. Plyushkin piled a whole pile in his corner and put it there every day.
5. Lensky entered the duel in pantaloons. They dispersed and a shot rang out.
6. Dantes was not worth a damn Pushkin.
7. Two horses entered the yard. These were the sons of Taras Bulba.
8. The tractor raced across the field, smelling slightly ...
9. Gerasim put a saucer on the floor, and began to poke his muzzle into it.
10. Onegin was hard inside, and he came to Tatyana to relieve himself.
11. Lermontov was born to his grandmother in the village, when his parents lived in St. Petersburg.
12. Chatsky went out through the anus and propped up the door with a stick.
13. Gerasim poured some cabbage soup for Mume.
14. Poor Liza tore flowers and fed her mother with this.
15. Khlestakov sat in the britzka and shouted: “Drive, my dear, to the airport!”
16. Chatsky's father died in childhood.
17. In the summer, the boys and I went on a camping trip with an overnight stay, and we took only the necessary with us: potatoes, a tent and Maria Ivanovna.
18. In his old age, he was bedridden with cancer.
19. Suddenly Herman heard the creak of springs. It was the old princess.
20. The boar found Katerina's soft spot and put pressure on him every day.
21. The Rostovs had three daughters: Natasha, Sonya and Nikolai.
22. Taras mounted a horse. The horse bent over, and then laughed.
23. Tatyana's soul is full of love and can't wait to pour it over someone.
24. There was a regiment of French and Kutuzov.
25. Onegin was a rich man: in the mornings he sat in the restroom, and then went to the circus.
26. Peter the Great jumped off the pedestal and ran after Eugene, loudly clattering his hooves.
27. Gogol's nose is filled with the deepest content.
28. Deaf-mute Gerasim did not like gossip and spoke only the truth.
29. Neither fathers nor children satisfy Turgenev.
30. Girls like Olga have long been tired of Onegin, and Pushkin too.
31. I met Mikhail Yurievich Lermontov in kindergarten.
32. Gerasim ate for four, and worked alone.
33. Pechorin kidnapped Bela in a fit of feelings and wanted through her love
get closer to the people. But he didn't succeed. He did not succeed with
Maksim Maksimych.
34. Chichikov has many positive features: he is always shaved and smells.
35. Pugachev helped Grinev not only in work, but also in love for Masha.
36. Silky, blond curls knocked out from under her lacy apron.
37. The sons came to Taras and began to get acquainted with him.
38. Famusov condemns his daughter for the fact that Sophia has been with a man since the very morning.
39. Thus, Pechorin took possession of Bela, and Kazbich - Karakez.
40. Natasha was a truly Russian nature, she loved nature very much and often went to the yard.
41. Gerasim left Tatyana and contacted Mumu.
42. Grushnitsky carefully aimed at the forehead, the bullet scratched the knee.
43. Poets of the 19th century were vulnerable people: they were often killed in duels.
44. Here he first learned colloquial Russian from his nanny Arina Rodionovna.
45. The first successes of Pierre Bezukhov in love were bad - he immediately got married.
46. As a result, not a man grew out of Tikhon, but a real sheep.
47. Kirsanov was sitting in the bushes, but he saw everything that was not necessary.
48. At first, Tatyana passionately loved Onegin, but he did not see her in the eye. But when she got cold, Eugene decided to start all over again. It was late.
49. The chairman took the milkmaids to the quick so much that the milk yield immediately increased.
50. When I read Gorky's novel "Mother", I myself wanted to become a mother.
Have a nice Sunday!
Short-term programs in business schools, refresher courses, business guru conferences. Executive Education is not a cheap pleasure. A good event rarely costs less than $1,000 a day, but it guarantees that participants will be excited. What about returns for the entire organization?
Inspired by new ideas and thoughts, the manager returns to his division. His employees did not communicate with the charismatic professor, but they solved a lot of current problems while the boss was away. They do not understand at all his enthusiasm for the studied model of strategic analysis, the theory of emotional intelligence, or the scheme of involving employees in decision making.
In the manager-boss relationship, the picture is about the same. The manager breathes a sigh of relief when his employee returns after several days of absence, and immediately overwhelms him with business. The manager, drawn into the usual course of affairs, gradually loses the initial ardor. New ideas, studied models and brought materials are forgotten. There remains a vague memory of something bright, interesting, but not requiring mandatory use.
To avoid this outcome, you need to act differently. The manager going to study discusses in advance with his immediate supervisor why he is sent to this particular program, what questions it is desirable to ask professors and course participants, what should be paid attention to. The temptation to look at the training course as an encouragement must be avoided. I once witnessed a situation when a manager sent an employee to improve their knowledge of the language in an old English castle in order to increase motivation. Two weeks in the countryside away from family, albeit in luxurious conditions and with excellent port wine, turned out to be torture for a person. Another manager bought tickets for seminars by well-known business concept authors and distributed them to the most advanced employees. As a result, they did not hear anything new, because they are already following the topic.
During the course, it is useful to write down ideas and thoughts that arise. If an idea seems particularly important to you, try immediately discussing it with the professor or other participants. It's good to call colleagues and subordinates left in the office and retell them a few of the theses that struck you. And immediately after the course, on the way home, make a plan for implementing the ideas born, indicating what resources and whose support you will need.
When you return to work, you need to take advantage of the “window of opportunity” that occurs after significant events in the life of an organization or manager. The program completed at the business school is one of such events. This also applies to subordinates: after returning from school, you can use the materials of the program to increase their level of knowledge.