Essay on the topic “Characteristics of Chatsky and Molchalin.”
Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is an outstanding work of Russian and world drama. The author poses and resolves problems that were important for his time: about patriotism, about public service, about human relationships. The main conflict of comedy is the clash noble society with a world of new people. The entire Famus circle belongs to the society, including Molchalin; Chatsky can confidently be classified among the “new people”.
Main character comedy - Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - a young, educated nobleman. He is noble, honest, smart. In the comedy, Chatsky is presented as a democrat, a humanist who speaks out in defense of freedom, education, and national culture. The emptiness and vulgarity of life in Moscow society amazes him. He despises sycophancy, passion for rank, spiritual emptiness, fights against the ideals, goals, aspirations of old Moscow, disgraces buffoonery, thoughtless luxury and disgusting morals. Chatsky wants to serve the Fatherland, and not some “persons”: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to be served.” He is actively fighting against Famus society, but in this society Chatsky is a stranger. He turned out to be a lone fighter. In addition, he does not see his main opponent - Molchalin.
Molchalin is young, the same age as Chatsky, but his complete opposite. Rootless and poor, he came to Moscow with the sole purpose of making a career. For this, he believes, all means are good. He even has his own theory of careerism, which his father bequeathed to him: please everyone, be “moderate and neat,” not have your own own opinion. Molchalin’s external manners do not correspond in any way to his internal qualities. This is what misleads many people. Everyone sees him as nice young man. Sofia did not see him either, believing his words about love, and Molchalin basely deceived her. Molchalin sees the meaning of his life in his well-being: “And win awards and have fun.” And this is the absolute opposite of Chatsky’s ideals. Molchalin is associated with the “past century” by a passion for rank, sycophancy, and emptiness of soul.
During the three years of Chatsky's absence, he achieved incredible success. An unknown, rootless tradesman received the rank of assessor and became Sofia's lover. He gradually gains strength, stopping at nothing, even deceiving a defenseless girl. He is ready to endure any humiliation in the struggle for power. No one can stand in his way.
In everything, always and everywhere, the opinions and actions of Chatsky and Molchalin are different, almost opposite. Sophia understands this too. Loving Molchalin, she sees an ideal in his vices, and shortcomings in Chatsky’s virtues.
The ideals of Chatsky and Molchalin indicate that Chatsky is a “new century”, and Molchalin is part Famusov society, which supported the remnants of the past and the old orders of the “past century.”
From comedy we can formulate the following: our mind is the cause of all the bad things we get from life. Hence the name of the comedy - “Woe from Wit”.
Intelligence, honesty, sincerity, the ability to think soberly and independently did not help Chatsky achieve freedom, enlightenment, national culture and begin a “new century,” probably because the past century was very firmly “stuck” in Moscow society. And changing the current order of all of Moscow has become beyond the power of one person, even one as purposeful as the main character Chatsky.
Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” is a unique copy of the emerging, but already irreconcilable struggle in society early XIX centuries between advanced, progressive-minded youth and conservative-minded representatives of serfdom. These two different social camps in the comedy are picturesquely represented by Chatsky and Molchalin - people of opposite positions in life, moral standards, worldview.
Despite the deep dissimilarity, in Molchalin and Chatsky one can find common features, which attracted each of them (in different time) Sofya Famusova. These two young and intelligent people are connected with Famusov’s house. Chatsky is the son of Famusov’s friend, raised in this house. At a young age, he left Moscow, “searched for his mind,” studied, saw and learned a lot. Molchalin works as a secretary in Famusov’s house and enjoys universal love and respect:
As I work and effort, Since I am listed in the Archives, I have received three awards.
But the author brings them together in a comedy, and we see how different Chatsky and Molchalin are from each other, and this dissimilarity cannot be hidden under the outer shell. The very appearance of these heroes in a comedy can tell about many of their character traits.
Chatsky literally bursts into the plot, he is passionately in love and is happy to see Sophia after a long separation. Joy and energy fill him so much that he does not immediately notice the girl’s coldness. Molchalin enters the comedy at first speechless, and then justified and confused. And soon we will learn something about these heroes through their assessment by others actors, in their speeches and actions.
How do the household members of the Famu-Sov house and the owner himself respond to Chatsky?
Who is so sensitive, and cheerful, and sharp, Like Alexander Andreich Chatsky!
He is sharp, smart, eloquent, especially happy with his friends... ...he is a smart guy, and writes and translates well.
Chatsky is a nobleman and proud of it. What distinguishes him from those around him is his love of freedom and independence of views, frankness and directness of statements. Chatsky sees the purpose of his life in serving the fatherland, he is a true patriot of his homeland, however, servility, the struggle for ranks, titles, awards oppress him and outrage him:
I would be glad to serve, but being served is sickening.
He is ready to serve “the cause, not individuals,” but in Famus society this is impossible. It is the independence of judgment, the desire to judge a person by his deeds, and not by the position he occupies in society, openness and directness in relation to Chatsky that causes complete misunderstanding of those around him, aggression and rejection on their part:
Oh! My God! he's a Carbonari! A dangerous person! And I don’t want to know you, I don’t tolerate debauchery.
And what about Molchalin? How did he gain the trust and win the sincere respect of those very people who are so ruthless towards Chatsky?
Look, he gained the friendship of everyone in the house, He served under the priest for three years, He is often angry to no avail, And he will disarm him with silence, Forgive him out of the kindness of his soul. And by the way, I could look for fun; Not at all: old people won’t set foot outside the threshold.
It takes a little time to understand that Molchalin completely accepts the laws of Famus society and becomes indispensable for it. He is cowardly and always subordinates his way of thinking to what is accepted in society:
Molchalin considers his most important virtues to be helpfulness, moderation and accuracy. A flatterer, a hypocrite, a sycophant and a worshiper of ceremonies, most of all in his life he dreams of “reaching the known degrees,” which will most likely come true, “after all, nowadays they love the dumb.” Calculating to the smallest detail, Molchalin can always count on support and patronage " powerful of the world this."
Relations with Sophia bring Chatsky and Molchalin together, two opposing positions painfully collide. Chatsky is impeccably honest and sincere with Sophia and expects the same frankness from her. He does not hide not only his joy and happiness, but also his bewilderment and even indignation. Very soon he realizes that he is not loved by the girl, but he wants to know: who is his rival?
Oh! Sophia! Was Molchalin really chosen by her? Why not a husband? There is only little intelligence in him; But who lacks intelligence to have children? Helpful, modest, with a blush in his face. Here he is, on tiptoe, and not rich in words; What kind of sorcery he knew how to get into her heart!
However, a few minutes of communication with this mean and flattering man dispels his suspicions:
With such feelings, with such a soul We love!.. The deceiver laughed at me!
Sophia is under the influence French novels holds a different opinion. Having fallen in love with a cunning and dishonest man, she does not know how to see the true face under the mask:
Molchalin is ready to forget himself for others, The enemy of insolence, - always shyly, timidly, whole night with anyone you can spend like that!
And what about Molchalin? Molchalin moves through life, fulfilling his father’s behests:
My father bequeathed to me: Firstly, to please all people without exception - the owner where he happens to live. To the boss, with whom I will serve, to his servant, who cleans dresses, to the doorman, to the janitor, to avoid evil. To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.
Therefore, for Molchalin, Sophia is just another step in conquering the career ladder. Without hesitation, he admits: Material from the site
And so I take the form of a lover to please the daughter of such a man.However, this does not prevent Molchalin from shamelessly flirting with Liza, with whom he does not even consider it necessary to hide his vile little soul:
I don’t see anything enviable in Sofya Pavlovna...
Having learned about Sophia’s chosen one, Chatsky cannot contain his indignation:
Here I am donated to! I don’t know how I curbed my rage! I looked and saw and didn’t believe it!
But Sophia is also struck by the “crookedness of the soul” of her former lover, and she drives him away in anger.
In his comedy, Griboyedov created a gallery of typical characters that go beyond the historical framework of the era and the play itself. Chatsky is the type of fighter who is ready to defend his beliefs in any situation, and even in case of defeat does not change them. Silent people today are called hypocrites and liars, vile careerists and sycophants. And in our time, “Silent people are blissful in the world,” but Chatsky is the engine of progress, a representative of young progressive youth.
I think that Griboyedov, having depicted the types of Chatsky and Molchalin, invited his contemporaries and descendants to make their own moral choice, learn to appreciate people by their human dignity, and not by the masks they wear.
Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search
On this page there is material on the following topics:
- comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molchalin
- Molchalin characteristics of Byron
- essay woe from wit Chatsky and Molchalin small
- full message about Chatsky
- essay comparison of Molchalin and Chatsky
Chatsky and Molchalin. “Woe from Wit” by Griboyedov is a socio-political realistic comedy, “one of the most topical works of Russian literature.” The comedy "Go" was written in the 20s of the 19th century, when after Patriotic War In 1812, changes took place in Russian society, when dissatisfaction with the existing order was brewing among the progressively minded nobility. The author reveals the content of the main conflict of the era: the collision of the “present century” and the “past century”, which does not want to give up its positions. The ASG contrasted the main character with the rest of the characters, representatives of the conservative part of society. The author himself pointed out this, explaining the main meaning of his comedy: “In my play there are 25 fools for one sane person.” The role of Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - the main role in comedy. Among the “twenty-five fools”, Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin is of great importance. Chatsky and Molchalin are not only stage characters that contribute to the development of action, but also social types. Chatsky and Molchalin are approximately the same age, but in everything else they are sharply different from each other. They oppose each other, and this opposition manifests itself in both love and social conflicts. Chatsky is talented, “his speech is full of intelligence and wit,” he always says what he thinks, “he has a heart, and, moreover, he is impeccably honest.” Molchalin’s “talents” consist of “moderation and accuracy.” Behind the mask of the wordless, modest, quiet, helpful secretary Famusov hides an unprincipled careerist, a heartless and hypocritical egoist. Chatsky comes from noble family. He is a hereditary nobleman and received a good education. Alexander Andreich has a wealth of life experience, he has traveled a lot, lived both in the village and abroad. Chatsky calls the “present century” the age of enlightenment and in every possible way praises the craving for knowledge, sciences and arts, “high and beautiful.” The rootless tradesman Molchalin was probably brought up worse than Chatsky. And if not for Famusov, Molchalin would have had to “smoke in Tver,” that is, serve with a minimum salary and almost without any opportunity to advance. However, Molchalin “inherited” one very “valuable” piece of advice from his father: My father bequeathed to me: First, to please all people without exception - the Master, where I happen to live, the Chief, with whom I will serve, his Servant, who cleans dresses, the Doorman , to the janitor, to avoid evil, to the janitor’s dog, so that it is affectionate. For Molchalin it is impossible to imagine a successful life without promotion. A career for him is the shortest and easiest path to honors and nobility. He associates service not with a sense of duty to the fatherland, but with awards and ranks. So, Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin has already received “three awards” and noble title. Chatsky does not demand “neither places nor promotion to rank.” He is ready to serve at the behest of duty, to “serve the cause”: I would be glad to serve, but it is sickening to be served. Chatsky, possessing a Decembrist worldview, appears in the comedy as an uncompromising fighter against the landowner-autocratic system. The meaning of Molchalin’s life is “to win awards and have fun.” The heroes' attitudes towards love are also opposite. Chatsky loves Sophia purely, sincerely. After all, it was only for her that he came to patriarchal Moscow. Molchalin is not capable of deep and sincere feeling: And so I take on the form of a lover to please the daughter of such a person... He loves Sophia “by position”, Lisa - “out of boredom”. Love for him is another means to achieve his base goals. Alexander Andreich is a freedom-loving hero. He does not take into account the opinion of the world, does not depend on anyone, he does not attach of great importance connections in society, he does not need patronage. Chatsky fearlessly says what he thinks about “aces”. If the “emptiest man” in “Famus society” is “put as a model,” then this means absolutely nothing to Chatsky. Foma Fomich was and will remain for Alexander Andreich “one of the most stupid”, and the imperious and powerful Tatyana Yuryevna is “nonsensical”. Moreover, Chatsky will passionately denounce class prejudices conservative nobility. This is the main difference between Chatsky and Molchalin. Molchalin firmly follows his father’s “will”: There he will pet the pug in time! It's time to rub the card in! But this desire to please everyone also has a negative side for him. Molchalin might be happy to express his opinion, but he cannot. He says: “At my age I should not dare to have my own opinion.” Dependence on others is a necessity for him. IN morally Chatsky is undoubtedly much richer than Molchalin. Chatsky does not take Molchalin seriously, does not see him as a worthy opponent, for him Molchalin is a complete nonentity, “a most pitiful creature.” But Molchalin doesn’t value Chatsky, who in his eyes is an ordinary loser. Chatsky underestimated Molchalin, and Molchalin did not understand Chatsky’s worldview at all. Chatsky - new person. “Famusov’s society” stands in his way, but the Molchalins turn out to be stronger and more tenacious. “Silent people are blissful in the world!” These words of Chatsky turned out to be prophetic: Silent people are eternal. But such heroic personalities as Chatsky will always appear during the abrupt change of one century to another. And this testifies to the true “immortality” of comedy. Chatsky is defeated, but morally remains a winner.
The comedy “Woe from Wit” by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov became an event in Russian literature at the beginning of the 19th century and was a rare example of its accusatory, satirical direction. I.A. Goncharov wrote that in the comedy “the main role, of course, is the role of Chatsky, without which there would be no comedy, but there would, perhaps, be a picture of morals.” In the image of Chatsky, Griboedov, for the first time in Russian literature, showed in full growth a “new” man, inspired by lofty ideas, raising a rebellion against a reactionary society in defense of freedom, humanity, intelligence and culture of man, inquisitively searching for new, more perfect forms of life, nurturing in himself new morality, producing A New Look to the world and to human relations. This is the image of a brave and irreconcilable fighter for a cause, for ideas, for truth, acutely confronted with a society of reactionaries and serf owners, slandered and insulted by this society, but not humbled before it. It was Chatsky who embodied the features of such a “new” person. In Famus society, Chatsky feels lonely. After a three-year trip abroad, without stopping at his home, straight from the carriage, he appears at Famusov’s house and meets with a very cool reception - both from the owner and from his daughter. His first glances provoke a sharp rebuff from Famusov and his guests, and Sophia, ardent with love, encounters a cold indifferent attitude on her part. According to Chatsky, the “past century” is characterized by universal fear, humility and servility - after all, “he was famous, whose neck bent more often!” “The present century,” according to Chatsky, condemns obedience and servility. He still naively believes in this. Later, as the play progresses, he will understand that “The silent ones dominate the world”, that “the meanest traits of the past” still have strong roots in a society based on autocracy and serfdom. By “the present century” Chatsky understands; revolutionary liberation movement of Russian social thought of the late 10s and early 20s of the 19th century. These passionate speeches of Chatsky evoke Famusov’s genuine fear: “He wants to preach freedom!” Chatsky’s monologue “Who are the judges?” is noteworthy. Chatsky passionately denounces socially recognized authorities. He feels like a man of “the present century.” In his monologue, Chatsky speaks on behalf of the new generation: Where, point out to Us, are the fathers of the fatherland... This is who we should respect in the wilderness! Here are our strict connoisseurs and judges! Who are we? Who did Chatsky mean here? "Judges" who are irreconcilable with " free life", he contrasts the younger generation, who are following different paths. In views on social order, on upbringing and education, civic duty and service, national culture, in remembering the meaning and purpose of life, Chatsky opposes the society of ignoramuses and serf owners. Gossip and slander are the main weapons of this society’s fight against people like Chatsky. An accurate, free, fiery word is Chatsky’s weapon. This is a powerful, truly devastating weapon. But old world still strong. And the ranks of his supporters are numerous. Chatsky is forced to flee from Famusov’s house and from Moscow “to search the world where there is a corner for an offended feeling”... However, Chatsky’s flight from Moscow cannot be perceived as his defeat. The Chatskys deal a terrible blow with their denunciations of Famus and Silence. The calm and carefree existence of Famus society is over. He was condemned, they rebelled against him, if the Chatskys are still weak in their struggle, then the Famusovs are powerless to stop the development of education and advanced ideas. This noble image in Griboyedov’s comedy is opposed by the image of Molchalin. If Chatsky is the son of a noble Moscow nobleman and he was brought up in his house, then Molchalin is a man of lower origin. Out of mercy, he is “warmed up” by Famueov, although, of course, he “needs” him. Molchalin has many business qualities, sufficiently educated. Chatsky was wrong to underestimate Molchalin. His silence is by no means stupid. It is no coincidence that Belinsky wrote that “Molchalin is devilishly smart when it comes to his personal conclusions.” The clash between the Chatskys and Molchalin is a conflict between the carriers opposite qualities noble youth of that time. Molchalin, unlike Chatsky, an intelligent and noble man, is smart and mean. The main qualities of his nature are baseness and meanness, which he skillfully hides. He is dumb only because he is “in small ranks.” This is a calculating player who will sell anything and anyone for the sake of his well-being. What cynicism and baseness must one go to in order to take advantage of a rich man's daughter falling in love with himself! Molchalin needs Sophia because she can “put in a good word.” For the Famueovs and Molchalins, their intelligence brings only benefits. Chatsky suffers from his progressive, freedom-loving mind. It is no coincidence that the Famus society declares Chatsky insane. Molchalin does not suffer a fiasco in the eyes of Famusov completely by accident. He is a “master of service” and will find himself a new patron. If Chatsky, as Herzen put it, “goes the direct route to hard labor,” then Molchalin will arrange his affairs and his career in any way. And yet, history has proven that victory will remain with such true patriots as Chatsky.
The play “Woe from Wit” is built on a conflict that is both personal and social. Social conflict is that the main character does not agree on life with society. The hero's personal problem is unrequited love. He comes from abroad in the hope of seeing his beloved and hopes for reciprocity. But, unfortunately, another person has already taken his place.
Chatsky and Molchalin live in the same city, in the same country, they are the same age and seem to be similar in many ways (after all, place of residence and society influence a person). But that's not true. These two heroes are as different as, for example, fire and water. Chatsky is “smart, truthful, eloquent.” Molchalin is his complete opposite. He is a hypocrite and a sycophant. There are no people in Famus’s society to whom he would not suck up. Molchalin will do everything to deserve good reputation. Chatsky characterizes this hero well and briefly:
Am I, Molchalina, stupider? Where is he, by the way?
Have you not yet broken the silence of the seal?
His last name speaks for Molchalin himself:
However, he will reach the known degrees,
After all, nowadays they love the dumb.
Molchalin loves “moderation and accuracy” in everything. He is very flexible not only with Famusov’s entourage, but also with Sophia herself. Against its background, it looks very colorless. Whatever Sophia asks, he, like a faithful servant, fulfills.
Chatsky very often speaks out about Molchalin, even in his presence. The main character does not agree with everything that Molchalin does. Alexander Andreich says about this:
Molchalin! - Who else will settle everything so peacefully!
There he will stroke the pug in time,
Zagoretsky will not die in it!..
Chatsky advocates openness, not silence. He refuses to echo the opinion of the old generation. Chatsky acts as a representative future Russia. Molchalin is just one of the representatives of Famus society. His commandments: “first, to please all people without exception” and “at my age I should not dare to have my own judgments.”
Chatsky is in love with Sophia, but, unfortunately, the past cannot be returned. But Chatsky, unlike Molchalin, loves unselfishly and sincerely.
The two heroes’ attitudes towards business and service are also different. Chatsky demands not to mix “fun or tomfoolery with business.” He will never bow down to people of the old order: “I would be glad to serve, but being served is sickening.”
Molchalin, following his unchanging traditions, bows to his elders, no matter what they claim. Of course, this cannot be done without sycophancy. He has no thoughts of his own, neither in business, nor in society, nor in love. He is called to submit to others. Chatsky thinks this:
Ranks are given by people;
And people can be deceived.
Chatsky believes that he also occupies an undeserved place in the service.
But no matter how many shortcomings and merits these two people have, the Chatskys and the Silencers will never fade into society. There are people who have their own opinions, but, unfortunately, there are also people who submit to others all their lives.
This article discusses two of the most famous hero Griboyedov from famous comedy“Woe from Wit” - Chatsky and Molchalin. An essay in which it is necessary to compare these characters has long been included in school curriculum. In this article we will present a plan possible composition and consider its points. In addition, we will provide a detailed comparative description of the heroes.
Essay “Woe from Wit”: Chatsky and Molchalin.
A plan for any speech development task that involves writing your own text is impossible without detail. Let's try to compose it:
- A short description of the comedy.
- Description of the image of Molchalin.
- Description of the image of Chatsky.
- Comparison of heroes.
- Summarizing.
About the product
The main characters of the play “Woe from Wit” are Chatsky and Molchalin. It is better to start the essay with a description of the work itself.
So, in the comedy, the author reflected the morals and behavior of society in the period from 1808 to 1824, and the action itself takes place after the War of 1812. Griboedov raises the most important problems of this time: patriotism, public service, serfdom, decadence in the spheres of education and enlightenment, human relationships. And all these issues are considered from two angles - from the point of view of people of the “present century” and the “past century”. It is in the struggle of Molchalin and Chatsky that the struggle of these generations is most clearly reflected.
Image of Molchalin
But why are Chatsky and Molchalin so different? The essay should provide a comprehensive answer to this question. Let's start by considering the image of Molchalin. He has his own ideals, beliefs and purpose in life. These are his goals - a high position in society, career growth, wealth. For Molchalin, the meaning of life lies in one’s own well-being: “to have fun and win awards.” To achieve his goal, he is ready to do anything - cunning, flattering, deceiving, dodging. This is what he himself says about it: “to please everyone without exception.” But this applies only to those who are higher in rank. With those who are lower than him, he does not stand on ceremony.
The image of Chatsky
We started talking about how Chatsky and Molchalin are different. The essay must include characteristics of both characters, so let's talk about Alexander Chatsky. He is an educated young nobleman, distinguished by progressive views, typical representative"of the present century". Chatsky is ready for selfless service to the Fatherland and wants to benefit people. The hero despises careerism, veneration, hypocrisy and pretense. This character is very close to the Decembrists in his beliefs. Chatsky does not approve of serfdom, treats the Russian people with respect, respects national culture and the Russian language. He treats Molchalin with obvious contempt.
Attitude towards love
Our essay moves on to describe the heroes’ relationship to love. Chatsky and Molchalin, whose characteristics are presented here, represent this feeling in completely different ways and treat Sophia accordingly.
Chatsky is sincerely attached to the girl and loves her with all his heart. It is only for the sake of Sophia that he decides to return to Moscow. However, his feelings are rejected, which he cannot accept for a long time.
Molchalin deceives Sophia, pretending to achieve advancement in career ladder. Despite his youth, Molchalin belongs to the “past century.” For him, the customs and morals of old Moscow are elevated to an ideal, which is why he is accepted by society with such cordiality.
At the same time, Chatsky is too susceptible own emotions and does not notice Sophia’s feelings. Molchalin remains cold and calculating. He is incapable of strong feelings.
Comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molchalin (essay)
You can compare characters in a number of ways:
Molchalin |
||
Character | A sincere, passionate, straightforward young man. feelings often prevent him from soberly assessing the situation. | Helpful, cautious and very secretive. the main objective- career and high position in society. |
Social status | Moscow nobleman without a large fortune. He is received warmly because of his background and connections. | A tradesman from the provinces. Known in the world, but has no weight. |
Education | Very enlightened and smart. Received a good education. | Very limited person, whose judgments are primitive. Didn't receive a decent education. |
Field of activity | Has no position. There are mentions that he served in the army. | |
Social views | Freethinker and patriot. He is not afraid to be indignant at the orders prevailing in society. | Absolutely accepts and respects the existing system. |
Career views | I am convinced that only sycophants can achieve high rank. He believes that he has no prospects. | Ready to do anything for the sake of a career - endure humiliation, make connections. He takes his service very seriously. |
Features of speech | Eloquent and witty. Speaks Russian, but can also insert French sentences. | Official, very respectful speech. When communicating with senior ranks, he begins to flatter and fawn. |
Relationship to each other | Treats Molchalin with contempt. He believes that he has no merits. Tries to make fun of him at every opportunity. | He perceives Chatsky neutrally. Treated with respect. But he doesn’t see any benefit for himself in this person. |
Humiliated and insulted, he leaves Moscow. He is disappointed in love and rejected by society. | His fate is not determined, since Famusov does not know about Molchalin’s connection with his daughter. The hero can continue to serve. |
|
Role in a comedy | The main character around whom all the conflicts of the play develop. | Main antagonist. He is the embodiment of ossification. |
Results
Our essay is coming to an end. Chatsky and Molchalin are opposed to each other in the comedy “Woe from Wit”. The author does this in order to make the characters’ characters appear more clearly. Griboedov, using the example of these characters, characterizes the present and past centuries, and the reader must draw conclusions. The author’s position is clear - he takes Chatsky’s side.
Despite the fact that two centuries have passed since the masterpiece was written, the comedy has retained its relevance today.